Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
8 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAECQBHC 49

Harker and Another v MGM Family Trust (Number: TM50521/1) and Others (2994/2022)

Harker and Another v MGM Family Trust (Number: TM50521/1) and Others (2994/2022) [2023] ZAECQBHC 49 (5 September 2023)

The High Court held that an executor-attorney’s conduct in pursuing unmeritorious litigation justified a personal costs order de bonis propriis.

  • Costs De Bonis Propriis
  • Fiduciary Duties Of Executor
  • Improper Conduct
  • Attorney Ethics
  • De-bonis-propriis
  • Executor-fiduciary-duties
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZALMPPHC 28

M.DV v C.DV (521/2022)

M.DV v C.DV (521/2022) [2023] ZALMPPHC 28 (5 June 2023)

The court dismissed an application to bar a law firm from acting in a divorce matter, finding no proven injury or reasonable apprehension of harm.

  • Conflict Of Interest
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Declaratory Relief
  • Final Interdict
  • Conflict-of-interest
  • Attorney-ethics
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAMPMBHC 22

Du Toit and Others v Du Toit-Smuts & Partners and Another (4748/2021)

Du Toit and Others v Du Toit-Smuts & Partners and Another (4748/2021) [2023] ZAMPMBHC 22 (12 April 2023)

The court found that the applicants’ claim for the return of the R25,000.00 reservation deposit had prescribed under the Prescription Act, as more than three years had elapsed since the debt became due, either from the date of demand or the conclusion of the contract. The deposit was paid into the trust account of the First Respondent as agent for the Second Respondent, and the correct party to sue was the Second Respondent, not the attorney. The applicants did not have a real right to the funds in the trust account, only a personal claim as trust creditors. The First Respondent was ethically…

  • Trust Account Liability
  • Prescription Of Debt
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Deposit Recovery
  • Agency Relationship
  • Legal Practice Act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZALMPPHC 41

Mokgaha and Others v Road Accident Fund (7188/2017,229/2019,2315/2019,2307/2019)

Mokgaha and Others v Road Accident Fund (7188/2017,229/2019,2315/2019,2307/2019) [2022] ZALMPPHC 41 (25 July 2022)

The High Court removed four Road Accident Fund matters from the roll after Dr Malaka denied authorship of expert affidavits and reports filed for the plaintiffs.

  • Expert Evidence
  • Fraudulent Affidavit
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Removal From Roll
  • Expert-evidence
  • Fraudulent-affidavit
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2021] ZAWCHC 83

Department of Environmental Affairs, Forestry and Fisheries v B Xulu & Partners Incorporated and Others (6189/2019)

Department of Environmental Affairs, Forestry and Fisheries v B Xulu & Partners Incorporated and Others (6189/2019) [2021] ZAWCHC 83; [2021] 3 All SA 166 (WCC) (4 May 2021)

The High Court found B Xulu & Partners and Barnabas Xulu in contempt of multiple prior orders, imposed a fine, suspended imprisonment, and litigation restrictions.

  • Civil Contempt Of Court
  • Wilful Disobedience
  • Enforcement Of Court Orders
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Anti Dissipation Order
  • Civil-contempt-of-court
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAECMHC 16

Millicent Molose obo Avile Molose v Member of the Executive Council for Health:Eastern Cape Province (1182/2017)

Millicent Molose obo Avile Molose v Member of the Executive Council for Health:Eastern Cape Province (1182/2017) [2019] ZAECMHC 16 (12 March 2019)

The High Court postponed a quantum hearing sine die after a dispute over notice and fraud allegations, and ordered the defendant to pay costs on an attorney-and-client scale.

  • Medical Negligence
  • Postponement Of Trial
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Quantum Of Damages
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Medical-negligence
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2017] ZAFSHC 220

Kramer v Westraad and Others; In re: Kramer v Ursispace (Pty) Ltd (5602/2016)

Kramer v Westraad and Others; In re: Kramer v Ursispace (Pty) Ltd (5602/2016) [2017] ZAFSHC 220 (19 October 2017)

The court joined the First Respondent to a liquidation matter for costs purposes, discharged the provisional liquidation order, and apportioned costs between the Applicant and First Respondent.

  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Withdrawal Of Proceedings
  • Costs Liability
  • Liquidation
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Joinder-of-parties
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2017] ZAGPPHC 143

Poto obo P v Kotsokwane Attorneys and Another (58147/2015)

Poto obo P v Kotsokwane Attorneys and Another (58147/2015) [2017] ZAGPPHC 143 (4 May 2017)

The High Court set aside a taxed allocator after finding the first respondent failed to disclose an earlier ruling and imposed attorney-and-client costs.

  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Review Of Taxing Master
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Punitive Costs Order
  • Taxation-of-costs
  • Review-of-taxing-master
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2015] ZAGPPHC 1118

Law Society of the Northen Provinces Others (Road Accident Fund (Intervening)) v Ronald Bobroff and Partners Inc. and Others (61790/12)

Law Society of the Northen Provinces Others (Road Accident Fund (Intervening)) v Ronald Bobroff and Partners Inc. and Others (61790/12) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1118 (26 August 2015)

The High Court dismissed a rule 30 challenge to a counter-application, holding it was not an irregular step and that broader ancillary relief was permissible.

  • Counter Application
  • Rule 30 Irregular Step
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Contingency Fee Agreements
  • Overreaching
  • Attorney Ethics
Read case analysis
Delict [2012] ZAGPJHC 248

Motswai v Road Accident Fund (2010/17220)

Motswai v Road Accident Fund (2010/17220) [2012] ZAGPJHC 248; 2013 (3) SA 8 (GSJ) (7 December 2012)

High Court criticism of a Road Accident Fund claim pursued without evidence of serious injury, with the court highlighting untrue pleadings, unnecessary experts, and wasted costs.

  • Road Accident Fund Act
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Costs De Bonis Propriis
  • Serious Injury Assessment
  • Expert Evidence
  • Attorney Ethics
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.