Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAGPPHC 785

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Zwiegers (12993/2017)

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Zwiegers (12993/2017) [2020] ZAGPPHC 785 (22 December 2020)

The High Court struck an attorney from the roll after finding repeated trust-account irregularities, poor accounting, dishonesty, and non-compliance with court orders.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Trust Account Irregularities
  • Fitness And Propriety
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Attorneys-act
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] ZAKZPHC 68

Legal Practice Council v Naicker and Another (2788/2019P)

Legal Practice Council v Naicker and Another (2788/2019P) [2020] ZAKZPHC 68 (6 November 2020)

The court found a legal practitioner misused trust funds and lied about payment status, but imposed a two-year suspension rather than striking off.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Fit And Proper Person Test
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
  • Suspension Of Legal Practitioner
  • Attorneys-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAECMHC 8

Cape Law Society v Mlindazwe (2857/18)

Cape Law Society v Mlindazwe (2857/18) [2020] ZAECMHC 8 (10 March 2020)

The court found that the respondent withdrew R75,000 from client trust funds but did so with the client's consent, as confirmed by the client's legal adviser. Although this conduct was irregular and breached the Cape Law Society's rules, it did not amount to dishonesty or theft. The respondent repaid the funds, and the client did not complain of prejudice. The court held that the respondent's conduct constituted a dereliction of duty and unprofessional behaviour but was not so serious as to render him unfit to practise as an attorney. The appropriate sanction was a conditional suspension rath…

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Fit And Proper Person
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPPHC 512

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Venter (29697/2017)

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Venter (29697/2017) [2019] ZAGPPHC 512 (9 October 2019)

The High Court found an attorney unfit to remain on the roll but, because dishonesty was not proved and he had retired, ordered a three-year suspension and costs.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Trust Account Irregularities
  • Fit And Proper Person
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
  • Attorneys-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAGPPHC 371

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Adekeye and Another (21758/2018)

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Adekeye and Another (21758/2018) [2018] ZAGPPHC 371 (17 May 2018)

The court found the application to be urgent due to the serious allegations of misappropriation of trust funds and the risk posed to the public and the Attorneys Fidelity Fund. The first respondent's objections regarding urgency, procedural fairness, and the need for a preliminary enquiry were dismissed. The court held that the disciplinary process under section 22 of the Attorneys' Act is appropriate and does not require prior internal enquiry. The audi alteram partem rule was satisfied as the respondent was given notice and an opportunity to respond before the court. The existence of parall…

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Fidelity Fund Certificate
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Urgency In Motion Court
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAFSHC 148

Claassen and Another v The Free State Law Society and Others (5940/2017)

Claassen and Another v The Free State Law Society and Others (5940/2017) [2018] ZAFSHC 148 (12 April 2018)

Urgent application to compel the Free State Law Society to seek suspension of an attorney was dismissed as premature, with attorney-and-client costs awarded to the Society.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Fit And Proper Person
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Costs Award
  • Attorneys-act-section-22
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAFSHC 145

Law Society of the Free State v Majola (4776/2015)

Law Society of the Free State v Majola (4776/2015) [2016] ZAFSHC 145 (12 August 2016)

The High Court suspended an attorney for one year after finding repeated non-cooperation with disciplinary directives and poor handling of client trust matters.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Fit And Proper Requirement
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Trust Account Management
  • Failure To Cooperate
  • Suspension Of Attorney
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAWCHC 38

Cape Law Society v Skibbe (24730/2015)

Cape Law Society v Skibbe (24730/2015) [2016] ZAWCHC 38 (4 March 2016)

The court struck an attorney from the roll after finding he misappropriated client trust funds and was no longer fit to practise.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Fitness To Practise
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
  • Attorneys-act-section-22
  • Misappropriation-of-trust-funds
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2014] ZAWCHC 110

Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Schoeman (15586/13)

Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Schoeman (15586/13) [2014] ZAWCHC 110 (29 July 2014)

The court found that the respondent's conduct in transferring trust funds to his personal accounts constituted misappropriation, regardless of his intention to repay the amounts. Such conduct is a serious breach of the standards expected of attorneys and undermines public trust in the profession. However, the court accepted that the respondent's actions were influenced by severe emotional distress and psychiatric illness, and that he had repaid all misappropriated funds, had no prior disciplinary record, and expressed genuine remorse. These exceptional circumstances justified a sanction less…

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
  • Fitness To Practice
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2013] ZAGPPHC 332

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v De Wet (Landman) and Others (65036/2011)

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v De Wet (Landman) and Others (65036/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 332 (10 December 2013)

The court found an attorney’s professional assistant guilty of failing to report trust-account misconduct and suspended him from practice, conditionally for three years.

  • Attorneys Act Section 22
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Trust Account Irregularities
  • Attorneys-act-section-22
  • Professional-misconduct
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.