Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 841

Attorneys Fidelity Fund Board of Control v Love and Others (7793/2015)

Attorneys Fidelity Fund Board of Control v Love and Others (7793/2015) [2024] ZAGPJHC 841 (26 August 2024)

The High Court dismissed the Fund’s leave-to-appeal application, finding no reasonable prospects of success and rejecting res judicata and issue-estoppel arguments.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Res Judicata
  • Issue Estoppel
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Attorneys Act Section 48
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2015] ZASCA 192

Probest Projects (Pty) Ltd v The Attorneys, Notaries and Conveyancers Fidelity Guarantee Fund (20761/2014)

Probest Projects (Pty) Ltd v The Attorneys, Notaries and Conveyancers Fidelity Guarantee Fund (20761/2014) [2015] ZASCA 192 (30 November 2015)

The SCA held that Probest only learned of the theft in late November 2009, so the Fund failed to prove late notice under s 48(1)(a).

  • Attorneys Act Section 48
  • Theft Of Trust Funds
  • Special Plea
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Knowledge Of Theft
  • Attorneys-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAWCHC 119

Probest Projects (Pty) Ltd v Attorneys Notaries And Conveyancers Fidelity Guarantee Fund (A21/14)

Probest Projects (Pty) Ltd v Attorneys Notaries And Conveyancers Fidelity Guarantee Fund (A21/14) [2014] ZAWCHC 119 (15 August 2014)

The court found that the appellant had actual knowledge of the theft of its funds by 23 July 2009, as evidenced by the conduct of its directors and the involvement of attorneys in preparing acknowledgment of debt and suretyship agreements. The appellant's actions indicated awareness of the misappropriation, and the subsequent delay in lodging the claim was due to attempts to resolve the matter privately. The statutory requirement under section 48(1)(a) was not met, as notice was only given on 20 November 2009, outside the three-month period. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the decisio…

  • Attorneys Act Section 48
  • Fidelity Fund Claims
  • Time Bar
  • Actual Knowledge
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.