Tax Faculty NPC v South African Institution of Taxation NPC (48140/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 839 (28 October 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
48140/21
Judge
de Vos
The applicant's case depended entirely on the validity of the 20 August 2018 accreditation document. The respondent provided detailed, largely unchallenged evidence that the document was drafted under threat from the applicant's CEO, was not properly authorised, and did not follow the respondent's accreditation procedures. The applicant failed to provide a substantive denial to these allegations. The respondent's version was therefore accepted. The court found that the applicant did not enjoy accreditation outside the terminated agreement, and the September 2021 correspondence did not constit…
Adcock Ingram Critical Care (Pty) Ltd v Batswadi Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd and Another (20402/2012) [2014] ZAGPJHC 48 (14 March 2014)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
20402/2012
Judge
Wepener
The High Court ordered inspection of respondents’ computers under Rule 36(6) to test the authenticity of disputed correspondence relied on in the pleadings.