Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family And Children [2024] ZAGPPHC 365

S.H v S.H (12415/22)

S.H v S.H (12415/22) [2024] ZAGPPHC 365 (17 April 2024)

An uncontested divorce involving a Zimbabwean marriage was granted, with the court also ordering redistribution of assets and no costs order.

  • Foreign Marriage Recognition
  • Irretrievable Breakdown
  • Redistribution Of Assets
  • Jurisdiction In Divorce
  • Authenticity Of Documents
  • Foreign-marriage-recognition
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2022] ZAGPPHC 839

Tax Faculty NPC v South African Institution of Taxation NPC (48140/21)

Tax Faculty NPC v South African Institution of Taxation NPC (48140/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 839 (28 October 2022)

The applicant's case depended entirely on the validity of the 20 August 2018 accreditation document. The respondent provided detailed, largely unchallenged evidence that the document was drafted under threat from the applicant's CEO, was not properly authorised, and did not follow the respondent's accreditation procedures. The applicant failed to provide a substantive denial to these allegations. The respondent's version was therefore accepted. The court found that the applicant did not enjoy accreditation outside the terminated agreement, and the September 2021 correspondence did not constit…

  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Accreditation Dispute
  • Authenticity Of Documents
  • Procedural Fairness
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPJHC 48

Adcock Ingram Critical Care (Pty) Ltd v Batswadi Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd and Another (20402/2012)

Adcock Ingram Critical Care (Pty) Ltd v Batswadi Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd and Another (20402/2012) [2014] ZAGPJHC 48 (14 March 2014)

The High Court ordered inspection of respondents’ computers under Rule 36(6) to test the authenticity of disputed correspondence relied on in the pleadings.

  • Discovery And Inspection
  • Rule 36 6
  • Authenticity Of Documents
  • Forensic Examination
  • Agency Agreement
  • Discovery-and-inspection
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPJHC 41

Adcock Ingram Critical Care (Pty) Limited v Batswadi Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Limited and Another (20402/2012)

Adcock Ingram Critical Care (Pty) Limited v Batswadi Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Limited and Another (20402/2012) [2014] ZAGPJHC 41 (14 March 2014)

High Court decision on Rule 36(6) discovery allowing inspection of computers and backups to test the authenticity of disputed correspondence.

  • Discovery And Inspection
  • Rule 36 6
  • Authenticity Of Documents
  • Forensic Examination
  • Confidential Information
  • Discovery-and-inspection
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.