Micro Math Trading 14 CC t/a Parkville Motors v Oelofse NO and Others (10345/05)
Micro Math Trading 14 CC t/a Parkville Motors v Oelofse NO and Others (10345/05) [2006] ZAGPHC 199 (18 May 2006)
The court found that the applicants were aware of the authorisation and its extension but failed to pursue the statutory remedies available under the Environment Conservation Act, nor did they institute review proceedings within the prescribed 180-day period under PAJA. The delay was both unreasonable and prejudicial, as the respondents had completed construction and commenced operation of the filling station in reliance on the authorisation. The applicants' explanations for the delay were inadequate, and their failure to seek interdictory relief or notify the respondents of intended review p…
Source excerpt
- Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
- Environment Conservation Act
- Judicial Review Delay
- Authorisation Extension
- Interdictory Relief
- Condonation For Late Review