Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 92

Foodcorp (Pty) Ltd v Sunshine Bakery Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM089Aug22)

Foodcorp (Pty) Ltd v Sunshine Bakery Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM089Aug22) [2022] ZACT 92 (5 December 2022)

The Competition Tribunal approved Foodcorp’s acquisition of Sunshine Bakery Holdings, subject to two-year procurement conditions to address possible foreclosure concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Vertical And Horizontal Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
  • B Bbee Ownership
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 99

Project Oxygen Bidco Proprietary Limited v Long4Life Limited (LM178Feb22)

Project Oxygen Bidco Proprietary Limited v Long4Life Limited (LM178Feb22) [2022] ZACT 99 (17 May 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Project Oxygen Bidco’s acquisition of Long4Life, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal And Vertical Overlap
  • Public Interest Employment
  • Spread Of Ownership
  • B Bbee Ownership
  • Brand Consolidation
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 82

SPE Mid-Market Fund I Partnership (represented by the general partner, SPE Mid-Market Fund I General Partner (Pty) Ltd) v Q Link Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM107OCT21)

SPE Mid-Market Fund I Partnership (represented by the general partner, SPE Mid-Market Fund I General Partner (Pty) Ltd) v Q Link Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM107OCT21) [2021] ZACT 82 (10 December 2021)

The Tribunal unconditionally approved SPE Mid-Market Fund I’s acquisition of sole control of Q Link Holdings, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Vertical Relationships
  • Public Interest
  • B Bbee Ownership
  • Information Sharing Risk
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 73

Hatfield Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Business of Summit Auto Trading South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM064Aug21)

Hatfield Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Business of Summit Auto Trading South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM064Aug21) [2021] ZACT 73 (26 October 2021)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Hatfield Holdings’ acquisition of the Summit auto businesses, finding no substantial competition harm and accepting public-interest conditions.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest Assessment
  • Market Definition
  • Horizontal And Vertical Effects
  • B Bbee Ownership
  • Employment Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 60

Imperial Capital Limited; Imperial Logistics Limited v Lift Logistics Holdco; Greendoor Group (Pty) Ltd (LM055Aug21)

Imperial Capital Limited; Imperial Logistics Limited v Lift Logistics Holdco; Greendoor Group (Pty) Ltd (LM055Aug21) [2021] ZACT 60 (23 September 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Imperial’s acquisition of Lift Logistics Holdco and Greendoor, finding minimal market overlap and no public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest
  • B Bbee Ownership
  • Substantial Prevention Or Lessening Of Competition
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 5

Alstom Societe Anonyme v Bombardier Transportation (Investment) UK Ltd (LM027May20)

Alstom Societe Anonyme v Bombardier Transportation (Investment) UK Ltd (LM027May20) [2021] ZACT 5 (12 March 2021)

The Tribunal conditionally approved Alstom’s acquisition of Bombardier, finding no substantial competition harm in South African rail markets but imposing supply conditions.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Market Concentration
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Refurbishment Market
  • Supply Chain Concerns
  • B Bbee Ownership
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.