Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2019] ZANCT 4

Mncanza v JD Consumer Electronics and Appliances (Pty) Ltd t/a Incredible Connection (NCT/117246/2018/ 75(1)(b))

Mncanza v JD Consumer Electronics and Appliances (Pty) Ltd t/a Incredible Connection (NCT/117246/2018/ 75(1)(b)) [2019] ZANCT 4 (21 January 2019)

Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Case number
NCT/117246/2018/ 75(1)(b)
Judge
D Terblanche

The Tribunal granted condonation for a five-day late filing, finding good cause and no prejudice. The underlying complaint concerned alleged misleading advertising.

  • Condonation
  • Late Filing
  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Bait Marketing
  • Misrepresentation
  • Late-filing
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2016] ZANCT 16

Mosaic Connections CC v First National Bank Limited (NCT/3294/2015/137(3))

Mosaic Connections CC v First National Bank Limited (NCT/3294/2015/137(3)) [2016] ZANCT 16 (10 May 2016)

Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Case number
NCT/3294/2015/137(3)
Judges
J Simpson, B Dumisa, F Sibanda

The Tribunal held it lacked jurisdiction over the dispute about FNB’s monthly account fee on a cheque account and dismissed the application.

  • Jurisdiction Of Tribunal
  • Credit Agreement Definition
  • Bait Marketing
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Contractual Variation
  • Tribunal-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2015] ZACGSO 4

Dispute Identification (201503-0232)

Dispute Identification (201503-0232) [2015] ZACGSO 4 (11 May 2015)

Court
Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
Case number
201503-0232
Judge
B Hughes

The Ombud held that a mistaken website price for a tool kit did not mislead the complainant, so the supplier was not bound to sell at R199.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Bait Marketing
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Strict Liability
  • Gross Error Test
  • Consumer-protection-act
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2014] ZACGSO 16

Incorrect price advertised: price not binding (Case 1) (20145261021)

Incorrect price advertised: price not binding (Case 1) (20145261021) [2014] ZACGSO 16 (2 July 2014)

Court
Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
Case number
20145261021
Judge
N Melville

The Ombud found a catalogue price error for a couch was not binding because the gap between the advertised and actual price was too large to mislead a reasonable consumer.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Bait Marketing
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Invitation To Treat
  • Advertised Price Liability
  • Consumer-protection-act
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.