Magano and Others v Kaps and Others (UM92/2020)
Magano and Others v Kaps and Others (UM92/2020) [2024] ZANWHC 80 (19 March 2024)
The High Court dismissed a Rule 42(1)(a) rescission application, finding no proof that attorneys lacked mandate and holding the delay of over three years unjustified.
- Rescission Of Judgment
- Mandate Of Attorney
- Delay And Condonation
- Board Resolution Validity
- Bank Account Signatory Change
- Rescission-of-judgment