The Ombud dismissed a complaint over R144,000 lost in SIM swap and phishing fraud, finding the cell provider was not liable because it did not directly enable the bank account access.
ABSA Bank Limited v Mahomed and Another (876/12) [2014] ZASCA 1; 2014 (2) SA 466 (SCA); [2014] 2 All SA 1 (SCA) (20 January 2014)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
876/12
Judges
Maya, Malan, Petse, Willis, Saldulker
The SCA held that ABSA was not liable for fictitious investment agreements used to conceal tax evasion, because its agent lacked authority and the claims were unproven.
S v Kwatsha (CC 65/2011) [2012] ZAKZPHC 50 (7 August 2012)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
CC 65/2011
Judge
Ndlovu
The court found that the accused, a financial planner at Standard Bank, committed 37 counts of fraud involving approximately R6 million by misrepresenting to clients that their funds would be invested with approved companies, instead diverting the money to Messin Projects CC. The accused's explanation that he was influenced by his father was rejected as improbable and fabricated. The court held that the aggravating circumstances—including the large sum involved, the number and vulnerability of victims, breach of trust, damage to the bank's reputation, and lack of recovery of funds—far outweig…