Kgosi v Kgosi and Others
Kgosi v Kgosi and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 336; 6134/2022 (23 May 2023)
The court found that the appointment of the first respondent as executrix was made on the erroneous assumption that she was the sole spouse of the deceased, when in fact the applicant's marriage was valid. The Master lacked statutory authority to remove the executrix on this basis, and the failure to act did not trigger a review under PAJA. The applicant's claim of locus standi was unfounded, as the Master has discretion to appoint any fit and proper person. There was no evidence of gross neglect or inefficiency by the first respondent, but the fairness of entrusting the applicant's share of…
Source excerpt
- Removal Of Executor
- Bigamous Marriage
- Administration Of Estates Act
- Putative Marriage
- Locus Standi
- Distribution Of Estate