Zeal Health Innovations (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Another (967/2023)
Zeal Health Innovations (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Another (967/2023) [2024] ZASCA 183 (27 December 2024)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the Acting Director-General unlawfully committed the Department to a contract price that exceeded the appropriated budget, in breach of s 38(2) of the PFMA and the principle of legality. The award of the tender and the contract were declared constitutionally invalid. However, Zeal Health was found to be an innocent party that had rendered services in good faith. The Court held that, while the contract was invalid, Zeal Health retained the right to pursue payment for services rendered as a just and equitable remedy under s 172(1)(b) of the Constitution. T…
Source excerpt
- Public Procurement
- Constitutional Invalidity
- Just And Equitable Remedy
- Specific Performance
- Principle Of Legality
- Budgetary Compliance