South Africa Case Law

Arnold and Another v Bird (3171/2016)

Arnold and Another v Bird (3171/2016) [2017] ZAKZDHC 30 (31 July 2017)

Court

Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban

Case number

3171/2016

Judge

Henriques

The court found that the first applicant was in wilful and mala fide contempt of the order of Gorven J dated 21 June 2016. The applicant had knowledge of the order, failed to comply by not depositing all monies into the Standard Bank account, and did not provide a reasonable or credible explanation for missing cash deposits or delayed responses to correspondence. The applicant's explanations were found to be unsatisfactory and not bona fide. The respondent, on the other hand, complied with the order of Moodley J dated 7 July 2016 by providing access to the Standard Bank account, and any delay…

Source excerpt

• Contempt Of Court
• Interim Relief
• Business Partnership Dispute
• Bank Account Control
• Punitive Costs
• Condonation

Muldery v Durban Concrete Fencing CC t/a Durban Concrete Fencing (12338/2010)

Muldery v Durban Concrete Fencing CC t/a Durban Concrete Fencing (12338/2010) [2011] ZAKZDHC 79 (4 November 2011)

Court

Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban

Case number

12338/2010

Judge

Ploos van Amstel

The High Court held that the applicant proved ownership of moulds he had brought to the respondent and ordered their return, with costs.

• Ownership Of Movable Property
• Interim Relief
• Urgent Application Procedure
• Business Partnership Dispute
• Ownership-of-movable-property
• Urgent-application-procedure