Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 79

Competition Commission of South Africa v Afrion Property Services CC and Others (CR245Mar17)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Afrion Property Services CC and Others (CR245Mar17) [2021] ZACT 79 (15 January 2021)

The Tribunal found Belfa Fire and Cross Fire liable for long-running collusive tendering, price fixing and market division, but dismissed the case against Tshwane Sprinklers.

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Price Fixing
  • Market Allocation
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Cartel Liability
  • Collusive-tendering
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACAC 4

Omnico (Pty) Limited and Another v Competition Commission and Others (142/CAC/JUNE 16; 143/CAC/JUNE 16; : CR049 JULY 2012)

Omnico (Pty) Limited and Another v Competition Commission and Others (142/CAC/JUNE 16; 143/CAC/JUNE 16; : CR049 JULY 2012) [2016] ZACAC 4; [2016] 2 CPLR 398 (CAC) (15 December 2016)

The court found that Omnico and Coolheat attended meetings where the collective raising of recommended retail prices was discussed and agreed upon. Their failure to publicly distance themselves from the consensus reached at the September 2008 meeting, combined with subsequent price increases in line with the agreement, constituted participation in a cartel. The court held that passive attendance and silence, in the context of anti-competitive discussions, is sufficient for liability under section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The evidence presented by the Commission was clear, consistent…

  • Horizontal Agreements
  • Price Fixing
  • Cartel Liability
  • Passive Participation
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Competition Act Section 4
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2013] ZACAC 3

MacNeil Agencies (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission (121/CACJul12)

MacNeil Agencies (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission (121/CACJul12) [2013] ZACAC 3; [2013] 2 CPLR 416 (CAC) (18 November 2013)

The court found, on a balance of probabilities, that MacNeil Agencies participated in three meetings in 2007 with other pipe manufacturers where price-fixing proposals were discussed and agreed. Although MacNeil's representatives claimed to be passive and did not expressly agree, their failure to publicly distance themselves from the collusive proposals created a reasonable impression of assent. The court applied the doctrine of quasi-mutual assent and held that MacNeil's conduct amounted to an 'agreement' as defined in the Competition Act. However, the court found that the administrative pen…

  • Price Fixing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Agreement Definition
  • Cartel Liability
  • Mitigating Factors
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.