Matsilele v Road Accident Fund (1975/2018) [2024] ZALMPPHC 180 (19 November 2024)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
1975/2018
Judge
Kganyago
High Court judgment on Road Accident Fund liability, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove negligence by the insured driver and dismissing the claim with costs.
Sibongile Maria Mthimkhulu obo Langalethu Patience Thabede v The Member of the Executive Council for Health for the Free State Province and Another (4056/2019) [2022] ZAFSHC 170 (7 July 2022)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
4056/2019
Judge
Loubser
The court found that the applicant could have acquired the necessary knowledge of the identity of the debtor and the facts from which the debt arose in 2012 or during the following two to three years, had she exercised reasonable care. The applicant attended support groups and clinics specializing in cerebral palsy and possessed the relevant hospital records, yet failed to consult medical professionals regarding possible negligence. The court held that any reasonable person in her position would have sought advice earlier. Therefore, in terms of Section 12(3) of the Prescription Act, the appl…
Source excerpt
Prescription Act
Medical Negligence
Institution Of Legal Proceedings Against Organs Of State
M v Road Accident Fund (47692/14) [2017] ZAGPPHC 352 (5 April 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
47692/14
Judge
Ephriam Seima
The High Court granted absolution from the instance after the plaintiff failed to prove the identity of the other vehicle and a causal nexus for RAF liability.
Harcus v Road Accident Fund (43607/12) [2014] ZAGPPHC 71 (14 February 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
43607/12
Judge
KGANYAGO
The court found the plaintiff’s driver solely negligent in a lane-change collision and held the Road Accident Fund liable for 100% of proven or agreed damages.
Brooks v Minister of Safety and Security (036/08) [2008] ZASCA 141; 2009 (2) SA 94 (SCA) ; [2009] 2 All SA 17 (SCA) (27 November 2008)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
036/08
Judges
Mpati, Farlam, Ponnan, Kgomo, Mhlantla
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed a dependant’s claim for loss of support arising from a breadwinner’s lawful incarceration, holding the claim fell outside the recognised delictual remedy.