Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Unahina Business Solutions (Pty) Limited (A2023/041004)
Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa v Unahina Business Solutions (Pty) Limited (A2023/041004) [2024] ZAGPJHC 554 (30 April 2024)
The appellant failed to meet the requirements for rescission of the default judgment. No adequate reasons for default were provided, and no bona fide defence on the merits was raised. The technical defences advanced—application of section 133 of the Companies Act, lack of jurisdiction, lack of locus standi, and non-joinder—were all found to be unsustainable. Section 133 did not apply as PRASA was not in business rescue; jurisdiction was established by PRASA's head office being in Johannesburg; locus standi was validly derived from the deed of cession; and non-joinder of Biggietech was not req…
Source excerpt
- Rescission Of Default Judgment
- Cession Of Book Debts
- Jurisdiction Of Magistrates Court
- Locus Standi
- Non Joinder
- Companies Act Section 133