Advanced Office Automation ta Nashua North East v Du Plessis (29566/2016) [2024] ZAGPJHC 760 (16 August 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
29566/2016
Judge
N.J. Graves
The High Court allowed amendment of particulars of claim, including substitution of the plaintiff by cession, and rejected objections based on Rule 15 and alleged prejudice.
Jacobs and Another v Garlicke and Bousfield Inc and Others (1340/2011) [2023] ZAKZDHC 66 (13 September 2023)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
1340/2011
Judge
Mossop
The High Court dismissed an application to substitute the plaintiff with the applicant, finding the company had no claim to cede and the applicant’s claim had prescribed.
Mapula Solutions (Pty) Ltd v African Bank Corporation of Zambia Limited and Others (33936/2016) [2023] ZAGPJHC 948 (24 August 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
33936/2016
Judge
M Victor
The High Court held that the plaintiff had locus standi, found coordinated breaches of the debt rescheduling agreement, and awarded R704,968,234 plus interest.
Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa v Phosfert Trading (Pty) Limited (2020/28966) [2023] ZAGPJHC 84 (3 February 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2020/28966
Judge
B.C. Wanless
The court found that the Respondent is unable to pay its debts within the meaning of section 345(1)(c) of the Companies Act. The Applicant established its claim as cessionary of GroCap, and the businesses of ATS and AOM fall within the statutory objects of the Land and Agricultural Development Bank Act. The Respondent's opposition based on statutory powers, suspensive conditions, and fraud was rejected as unsupported by evidence and untenable. The court applied the Plascon-Evans rule and concluded that the Applicant's version prevails on the probabilities. The Respondent's commercial insolven…
Nedbank Limited v Stroh and Others (22990/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 909 (22 November 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
22990/2022
Judge
Davis
The High Court granted summary judgment against the second defendant, finding his denial of signing a suretyship was a bare denial and not a bona fide defence.
Noridane Foods AS v Ribzone (Pty) Limited and Another (21/16389) [2022] ZAGPJHC 516 (4 August 2022)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
21/16389
Judge
Nochumsohn
The Plaintiff failed to prove the cession of Westfleisch’s claim against the First Defendant, as the purported cession document was not signed by Westfleisch and no confirmatory affidavit was provided. The Plaintiff also did not comply with rule 18(6) by failing to attach the cession to the summons. The Defendant raised a bona fide defence that warrants the matter proceeding to trial. The Second Defendant’s business rescue status precludes relief against it at this stage, but does not affect the claim against the First Defendant. Accordingly, summary judgment is refused and leave to defend is…
PGN Civils (PTY) LTD v Greater Giyani Municipality (4924/2020) [2022] ZALMPPHC 6 (21 January 2022)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
4924/2020
Judge
MG Phatudi
The court found that the applicant's claims were mutually contradictory and unquantifiable, with discrepancies between the amounts pleaded and the supporting documents. The applicant attempted to introduce new facts in reply, which is impermissible in provisional sentence proceedings. The completion certificate relied upon did not quantify the amounts due and was not a liquid document. The defendant provided evidence of payment and cession, raising a bona fide defence. The applicant failed to establish a clear and sustainable cause of action in the summons, and the application for provisional…
Murray N.O. and Others v Humansdorp Co-Operative Limited (1697/2019) [2021] ZAECGHC 70 (26 July 2021)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
1697/2019
Judge
Stretch
Liquidators sought to set aside a payment to Humansdorp Co-operative as a disposition without value. The court held the company received value and dismissed the application.