Bothma-Batho Transport (Pty) Limited and Another v Nedbank Limited (223/2014)
Bothma-Batho Transport (Pty) Limited and Another v Nedbank Limited (223/2014) [2015] ZASCA 31 (25 March 2015)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the bank could not compel a replacement life policy by importing a tacit term where the contract already dealt with premiums and remedies.
- Cession Of Life Policy
- Security For Debt
- Implied And Tacit Terms
- Contractual Remedies
- Cession-of-life-policy
- Security-for-debt