Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
7 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZASCA 114

Ntuli v S (128/2023)

Ntuli v S (128/2023) [2025] ZASCA 114 (30 July 2025)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the State did not indicate in the charge sheet, nor at any stage of the proceedings, that it intended to rely on the doctrine of common purpose in respect of the attempted murder counts. The evidence presented was contradictory regarding the appellant's direct participation, and the State's case was prosecuted on the basis of individual culpability. The full court erred in confirming the convictions by applying common purpose, as the appellant was not forewarned and could not properly defend himself against that basis for conviction. This amounted to a vi…

  • Common Purpose
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Minimum Sentences Act
  • Bill Of Rights Limitation
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZANWHC 67

Witbooi v S (CA29/2022)

Witbooi v S (CA29/2022) [2023] ZANWHC 67 (30 May 2023)

The Regional Court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment without the charge sheet referencing section 51(1) of the Minimum Sentences Act and without warning the unrepresented appellant of the potential consequences. This omission constituted a gross irregularity, as the appellant was not afforded sufficient notice to prepare his defence or understand the seriousness of the charge. The appellate court found that the sentence must be set aside and replaced with the longest sentence the Regional Court could lawfully impose, considering the appellant's violent criminal history and the circumsta…

  • Minimum Sentences Act
  • Rape
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Sentencing Irregularity
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAECMKHC 29

African Paper Products (Pty) Ltd and Another v Director of Public Prosecutions: Eastern Cape and Another (Leave to Appeal) (250/2020)

African Paper Products (Pty) Ltd and Another v Director of Public Prosecutions: Eastern Cape and Another (Leave to Appeal) (250/2020) [2023] ZAECMKHC 29 (9 March 2023)

The High Court refused leave to appeal, finding no reasonable prospects of success and holding that the applicants had not shown a reviewable irregularity.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Reasonable Prospects Of Success
  • Gross Irregularity
  • Review Vs Appeal
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAFSHC 207

Mokgele v S (A205/2018)

Mokgele v S (A205/2018) [2018] ZAFSHC 207 (22 November 2018)

The Free State High Court dismissed an appeal against a 20-year sentence for housebreaking with intent to rape and rape, finding no unfairness from the charge-sheet omission.

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Rape
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Minimum-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZACC 27

M T v S; A S B v S; September v S (CCT122/17; CCT220/17; CCT298/17)

M T v S; A S B v S; September v S (CCT122/17; CCT220/17; CCT298/17) [2018] ZACC 27; 2018 (2) SACR 592 (CC); 2018 (11) BCLR 1397 (CC) (3 September 2018)

The Constitutional Court refused leave to appeal in three minimum-sentences cases, holding that omission from a charge sheet does not automatically make a trial unfair.

  • Minimum Sentences
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Condonation
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Jurisdiction Of Courts
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAGPPHC 395

Mandlazi v S (A765/2016)

Mandlazi v S (A765/2016) [2018] ZAGPPHC 395 (22 May 2018)

The High Court dismissed Lucky Mandlazi’s appeal against conviction and sentence for rape and housebreaking, finding the trial fair and the minimum sentence properly applied.

  • Rape
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Vulnerable Victim
  • Grievous Bodily Harm
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Minimum-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZASCA 181

Msimango v S (698/2017)

Msimango v S (698/2017) [2017] ZASCA 181; 2018 (1) SACR 276 (SCA) (1 December 2017)

The appeal court set aside the attempted-murder conviction based on common purpose, reduced the robbery sentence to 13 years, and dismissed the robbery conviction appeal.

  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Common Purpose
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Common-purpose
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZAGPPHC 371

Khauli and Another v S (A1010/2008)

Khauli and Another v S (A1010/2008) [2017] ZAGPPHC 371 (27 June 2017)

The High Court upheld a sentence appeal, finding the appellants had not been warned of the minimum-sentence regime and substituting lesser concurrent sentences.

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Compelling And Substantial Circumstances
  • Minimum-sentencing
  • Fair-trial-rights
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAWCHC 109

Van Ieperen v S (A194/2016)

Van Ieperen v S (A194/2016) [2016] ZAWCHC 109; 2017 (1) SACR 226 (WCC) (26 August 2016)

The High Court upheld an appeal against a crimen injuria conviction, setting aside the conviction and sentence because section 270 of the CPA could not be used.

  • Competent Verdicts
  • Crimen Injuria
  • Sexual Offences
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Crimen-injuria
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] ZANWHC 67

Moraka v S (CA30/15)

Moraka v S (CA30/15) [2015] ZANWHC 67 (15 October 2015)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against rape conviction and life sentence, finding no unfairness in the charge sheet and no substantial and compelling circumstances.

  • Minimum Sentence Legislation
  • Rape
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
  • Minimum-sentences
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.