Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
M.M.V.Z v R.T.D.M.V.Z (076638/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 262 (17 March 2025)
Rule 43 interim relief was refused in a pending divorce because the applicant’s evidence of need was not persuasive and her financial position had improved.
M.A.M (Born M) v M.D.M (007044/22) [2025] ZAGPPHC 188 (26 February 2025)
Divorce judgment awarding division of the joint estate, rehabilitative spousal maintenance for five years, child residence with the plaintiff, and pension sharing.
G.T v J.J.T (5617/2023) [2024] ZAFSHC 74 (29 February 2024)
Rule 43 parenting and maintenance order in a divorce matter. The court rejected supervised contact, granted joint parental rights, and set phased unsupervised contact and maintenance.
R.K.K v M.D.K (20413/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 140 (20 February 2024)
Rule 43 interim relief in a divorce dispute: the court ordered spousal maintenance, a legal costs contribution, and a child psychologist assessment.
J.L.M v K.W.K.M (2023-002520) [2023] ZAGPPHC 41 (29 January 2023)
The High Court held that a Rule 43 interim order was not appealable, was not suspended by leave to appeal, and could be enforced. The contempt bid failed.
C.G.S v S.B.S (3616/2020) [2022] ZAMPMBHC 67 (12 August 2022)
Divorce judgment on joint estate division, pension interests, child residence and costs, with the court refusing forfeiture and ordering equal division.
S[....] v S[....] (D7960/2019) [2022] ZAKZDHC 7 (18 February 2022)
The High Court dismissed a father’s bid to enforce a mirror order returning a child to the UK, finding the child’s best interests required him to remain with his mother in South Africa.
L.B v C.B and Another (2650/2020) [2021] ZAFSHC 222 (28 October 2021)
Interim parenting order pending divorce granted shared weekly residence and full parental rights to both parents, guided by the child’s best interests.
M[...] v B[...] (16306/2021) [2021] ZAGPPHC 230 (12 April 2021)
Urgent interim relocation and custody dispute over a six-year-old child. The court awarded primary care to the father pending Family Advocate investigation.
OLJ v OLA (1370/2018) [2020] ZAECGHC 92 (21 August 2020)
The court recorded the applicant’s compliance with an earlier order to return the minor children, declined further action for now, and warned against повторed non-compliance.
Explore more
