R.M.T v P.D.T (28972/2023)
R.M.T v P.D.T (28972/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 714 (16 July 2024)
The applicant satisfied the requirements for contempt of court by proving the existence of a valid court order, the respondent's knowledge of the order, and her failure to comply. The respondent's allegations of sexual abuse, which formed the basis for withholding contact, were not substantiated by evidence and had previously been investigated in the Children's Court and divorce proceedings. In the interests of fairness, the court granted the respondent an opportunity to substantiate her allegations through a detailed affidavit. If she fails to do so, it will be inferred that there are no def…
Source excerpt
- Contempt Of Court
- Contact Rights
- Sexual Abuse Allegations
- Children's Court Orders