K.K.S N.O v Director-General of Home Affairs (59209/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 134 (7 February 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
59209/2021
Judge
Nyathi
The High Court dismissed a contempt application against the Director-General of Home Affairs, finding the delay in complying with a passport and birth-certificate order was not shown to be wilful or mala fide.
Section 6(1)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 is irrational and constitutionally invalid. The provision causes automatic loss of citizenship without notice or legitimate government purpose, and the ministerial discretion under section 6(2) does not cure this irrationality. The Act permits dual citizenship elsewhere and provides for voluntary renunciation, rendering section 6(1)(a) arbitrary and redundant. The loss of citizenship under this section unjustifiably limits the right to citizenship and related constitutional rights, such as political participation, freedom of move…
Ndwandwe v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (31253/18) [2022] ZAGPPHC 547 (19 July 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
31253/18
Judge
V M Nqumse
The High Court dismissed a review challenging a finding that the applicant was a Zimbabwean national and illegal foreigner, holding no PAJA ground was made out.
Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (48418/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 500 (6 August 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
48418/2018
Judge
NJ Kollapen
The court held that section 6(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act does not violate the Constitution. The provision is rationally connected to the legitimate purpose of regulating citizenship and dual citizenship. The loss of citizenship under section 6(1)(a) is triggered by a voluntary and formal act by the citizen, and the Act provides a mechanism for retaining citizenship by application to the Minister. The distinction between deprivation and loss of citizenship is constitutionally significant; deprivation is prohibited, but loss is expressly permitted. The loss of citizenship does not constitute…
M[....] and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (26235/20) [2021] ZAGPPHC 318 (21 May 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
26235/20
Judge
SDJ Wilson
Leave to appeal was refused in a review concerning an unabridged death certificate and PAJA delay extension, with the court finding no prospect of success.
Minister of Home Affairs and Others v Jose and Another; In re Jose and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (38981/17) [2019] ZAGPPHC 348 (12 August 2019)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
38981/17
Judge
S Yacoob
Leave to appeal was granted only on whether the court could order the Minister to grant citizenship applications rather than merely consider them.
The exclusion of permanent residents from social grants on the basis of citizenship is inconsistent with the Constitution because section 27 protects access to social security for everyone, the discrimination is unfair and unjustifiable, and the appropriate remedy is to read in the words 'or permanent resident' after 'citizen'/'citizens' in the impugned provisions, including the not-yet-commenced section 4B(b)(ii).