Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 134

K.K.S N.O v Director-General of Home Affairs (59209/2021)

K.K.S N.O v Director-General of Home Affairs (59209/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 134 (7 February 2025)

The High Court dismissed a contempt application against the Director-General of Home Affairs, finding the delay in complying with a passport and birth-certificate order was not shown to be wilful or mala fide.

  • Contempt Of Court
  • Citizenship
  • Passport Application
  • Rescission Of Order
  • Contempt-of-court
  • Passport-application
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2023] ZAGPPHC 551

Ndlovu and Another v Director General: Department of Home Affairs and Another

Ndlovu and Another v Director General: Department of Home Affairs and Another [2023] ZAGPPHC 551; 81327/2017 (11 July 2023)

The court set aside Home Affairs decisions declaring a citizen an illegal immigrant, holding the officials lacked authority and acted unfairly.

  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Deprivation Of Citizenship
  • Immigration Act Interpretation
  • Self Help By State
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2023] ZASCA 97

Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (67/2022)

Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (67/2022) [2023] ZASCA 97; 2023 (6) SA 156 (SCA) (13 June 2023)

Section 6(1)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 is irrational and constitutionally invalid. The provision causes automatic loss of citizenship without notice or legitimate government purpose, and the ministerial discretion under section 6(2) does not cure this irrationality. The Act permits dual citizenship elsewhere and provides for voluntary renunciation, rendering section 6(1)(a) arbitrary and redundant. The loss of citizenship under this section unjustifiably limits the right to citizenship and related constitutional rights, such as political participation, freedom of move…

  • Citizenship
  • Automatic Loss Of Citizenship
  • Irrationality Review
  • Bill Of Rights Limitation
  • Ministerial Discretion
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2023] ZAGPPHC 239

Akimpaye and Others v Minister Of Home Affairs and Others

Akimpaye and Others v Minister Of Home Affairs and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 239; 19551/2020 (11 April 2023)

The High Court dismissed a rescission application, finding the delay unexplained and the respondents’ defence to be bare legal conclusions.

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Citizenship
  • Procedural Unfairness
  • Condonation
  • Refugee Status Determination
  • Rescission-of-judgment
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2022] ZAGPPHC 547

Ndwandwe v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (31253/18)

Ndwandwe v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (31253/18) [2022] ZAGPPHC 547 (19 July 2022)

The High Court dismissed a review challenging a finding that the applicant was a Zimbabwean national and illegal foreigner, holding no PAJA ground was made out.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Immigration Act
  • Citizenship Determination
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2021] ZAGPPHC 500

Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (48418/2018)

Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (48418/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 500 (6 August 2021)

The court held that section 6(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act does not violate the Constitution. The provision is rationally connected to the legitimate purpose of regulating citizenship and dual citizenship. The loss of citizenship under section 6(1)(a) is triggered by a voluntary and formal act by the citizen, and the Act provides a mechanism for retaining citizenship by application to the Minister. The distinction between deprivation and loss of citizenship is constitutionally significant; deprivation is prohibited, but loss is expressly permitted. The loss of citizenship does not constitute…

  • Citizenship
  • Loss Of Citizenship
  • Bill Of Rights Limitation
  • Irrationality Review
  • Dual Citizenship
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2021] ZAGPPHC 318

M[....] and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (26235/20)

M[....] and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (26235/20) [2021] ZAGPPHC 318 (21 May 2021)

Leave to appeal was refused in a review concerning an unabridged death certificate and PAJA delay extension, with the court finding no prospect of success.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Citizenship Status
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Extension Of Time Limits
  • Administrative-law
  • Paaja
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2019] ZAGPPHC 348

Minister of Home Affairs and Others v Jose and Another; In re Jose and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (38981/17)

Minister of Home Affairs and Others v Jose and Another; In re Jose and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (38981/17) [2019] ZAGPPHC 348 (12 August 2019)

Leave to appeal was granted only on whether the court could order the Minister to grant citizenship applications rather than merely consider them.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Citizenship Application
  • Separation Of Powers
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2017] ZAGPPHC 1078

Nkosi v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (63708/2016)

Nkosi v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (63708/2016) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1078 (18 December 2017)

The High Court upheld an exception to a plea, holding that the Immigration Act does not empower an officer to declare a citizen an illegal foreigner.

  • Immigration Act
  • Citizenship Deprivation
  • Pleading Exception
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Immigration-law
  • Citizenship
Read case analysis
Constitutional law

Mahlaule and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others; Khosa and Others v Minister of Soical Development

The exclusion of permanent residents from social grants on the basis of citizenship is inconsistent with the Constitution because section 27 protects access to social security for everyone, the discrimination is unfair and unjustifiable, and the appropriate remedy is to read in the words 'or permanent resident' after 'citizen'/'citizens' in the impugned provisions, including the not-yet-commenced section 4B(b)(ii).

  • Social security
  • Equality
  • Citizenship
  • Permanent residents
  • Child-support grants
  • Care-dependency grants
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.