Tahilram v Kayser and Others In re: Kayser and Others v Tahilram (2020/10390)
Tahilram v Kayser and Others In re: Kayser and Others v Tahilram (2020/10390) [2021] ZAGPJHC 751 (26 November 2021)
The court held that rule 24(2) allows a defendant to pursue a claim in reconvention against both the plaintiffs and a third party, provided leave is obtained and the claim is legally cognisable. The defendant demonstrated locus standi and a cause of action under the Companies Act, and the claims in convention and reconvention arise from the same factual matrix involving shareholding and directorship in the company. The court found that the proposed claim in reconvention is not excipiable, as the grounds of exception raised by the plaintiffs pertain to vagueness and embarrassment rather than l…
Source excerpt
- Joinder Of Parties
- Claims In Reconvention
- Companies Act Section 162
- Delinquent Director
- Statement And Debatement Of Account