Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2021] ZAGPJHC 885

Zam Zam Logistics and Another v Trademore (Pty) Ltd (27424/16)

Zam Zam Logistics and Another v Trademore (Pty) Ltd (27424/16) [2021] ZAGPJHC 885 (23 November 2021)

The High Court dismissed a rescission application against a default judgment, finding no adequate explanation for non-appearance and no viable defence on the merits.

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Default Judgment
  • Close Corporation Act Section 64
  • Reckless Trading
  • Negligence
  • Damages For Destruction Of Goods
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2003] ZAWCHC 31

Burley Appliances Limited v Grobbelaar N.O. and Others (3029/2001)

Burley Appliances Limited v Grobbelaar N.O. and Others (3029/2001) [2003] ZAWCHC 31; [2003] 3 All SA 505 (C); 2004 (1) SA 602 (C) (14 July 2003)

The High Court held that statutory claims under sections 64 and 65 of the Close Corporation Act are subject to ordinary prescription rules.

  • Close Corporation Act Section 64
  • Close Corporation Act Section 65
  • Prescription Act Section 10 11 12
  • Insolvency Act Section 34
  • Piercing Corporate Veil
  • Reckless Trading
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.