Berend v Road Accident Fund (942/2022) [2025] ZANCHC 45 (30 May 2025)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
942/2022
Judge
Williams
The court held that GEMS-paid medical expenses remained recoverable from the Road Accident Fund, treating the medical aid payment as a collateral benefit.
Standard General Insurance Co Ltd v Dugmore NO (498/95) [1996] ZASCA 89; 1997 (1) SA 33 (SCA); [1996] 4 All SA 415 (A); (11 September 1996)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
498/95
Judges
Van Heerden, Vivier, Eksteen, Marais, Olivier
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that disability pension benefits received under the Syfrets Pension Fund were deductible from the plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings, as they were provided for under the contract of employment and intended as compensation for loss of earning capacity. The Court found the facts indistinguishable from Dippenaar v Shield Insurance Co Ltd and reaffirmed that such benefits must be deducted to avoid double recovery. In contrast, the Lloyd's group accident insurance payments were not deductible, as they were not provided for under the contract of employment and w…
Mutual and Federal Insurance Company Ltd. v Swanepoel (446/1986) [1987] ZASCA 143; [1988] 4 All SA 228 (AD) (30 November 1987)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
446/1986
Judges
Rabie, Corbett, Viljoen, Van Heerden, Steyn
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondent's military pension, awarded under the Military Pensions Act, is not compensation for loss of earnings or earning capacity. The Act determines disability percentages without reference to earning capacity, and the pension is paid from public funds as a solatium for the totality of the consequences of disablement, particularly those not readily measurable in monetary terms. The respondent's damages claim was based on prospective private sector employment, not his military service, making the pension irrelevant to the assessment of patrimonial…