Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 1420

Regiments Fund Managers (Pty) Ltd and Others v Nel NO and Another (2022-007672)

Regiments Fund Managers (Pty) Ltd and Others v Nel NO and Another (2022-007672) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1420 (1 December 2023)

The High Court held that a restraint order under POCA stripped the applicants’ boards of authority, leaving them without locus standi to bring the application.

  • Locus Standi
  • Curatorship
  • Restraint Of Property
  • Companies Act Section 66
  • Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
  • Locus-standi
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZAGPJHC 877

Zelbree Investments (PTY) Limited and Others v Theunissen (A3034/2020)

Zelbree Investments (PTY) Limited and Others v Theunissen (A3034/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 877 (15 November 2022)

High Court appeal on director remuneration under section 66(9) of the Companies Act upheld the special plea: no special resolution meant no director’s fees.

  • Director Remuneration
  • Companies Act Section 66
  • Special Resolution Requirement
  • Appealability Of Orders
  • Director-remuneration
  • Companies-act-section-66
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2021] ZAGPPHC 199

Mhlwana and Another v Denel SOC Ltd (40858/19)

Mhlwana and Another v Denel SOC Ltd (40858/19) [2021] ZAGPPHC 199 (19 March 2021)

The High Court held that Denel’s board resolutions on conversion payments to executive directors were unlawful without shareholder approval, dismissed the claim, and granted Denel’s counter-application.

  • Directors Remuneration
  • Companies Act Section 66
  • State Owned Enterprise Guidelines
  • Ultra Vires Board Resolutions
  • Employment Contract Conversion
  • Directors-remuneration
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAGPPHC 758

Cullinan Holdings Limited v Lezmin 2768 CC (51762/2016)

Cullinan Holdings Limited v Lezmin 2768 CC (51762/2016) [2016] ZAGPPHC 758 (26 August 2016)

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the board of directors authorised the institution of the present proceedings. The only evidence presented was a certified extract of the board minutes signed by the deponent, without a copy of the resolution signed by the directors. The respondent's challenge to the authority was not met with adequate proof. The court distinguished the ANC Umvoti case, noting that the challenge here was not under Rule 7(1) but concerned substantive authority under section 66 of the Companies Act. As a result, the applicant did not discharge the onus to…

  • Authority To Institute Proceedings
  • Companies Act Section 66
  • Board Resolution
  • Power Of Attorney
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.