Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 198

Barbaglia v Barbaglia and Others (16659/2021)

Barbaglia v Barbaglia and Others (16659/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 198 (4 April 2022)

The High Court granted interim interdictory relief to preserve Pabar’s assets, records, and access rights, and enforced an interim salary arrangement pending related litigation.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Universal Partnership
  • Company Records Access
  • Prescription Act
  • Settlement Agreement Enforcement
  • Fiduciary Duties
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZANCHC 31

Members of Seed of Life v Board of Directors of Seed of Life and Others (2201/2019)

Members of Seed of Life v Board of Directors of Seed of Life and Others (2201/2019) [2020] ZANCHC 31 (26 June 2020)

The application is fatally defective due to lack of proper authority for Ms Mogorosi to act on behalf of the shareholders and the failure to join the company, Seed of Life Investments (Pty) Ltd, as a necessary party. The applicant failed to establish locus standi, as the entity 'Members of Seed of Life' is not a legal person and the authority from shareholders was insufficient. The company is directly affected by the relief sought, particularly regarding access to documents, and must be joined. The applicant also failed to disclose material facts in the ex parte urgent application, including…

  • Urgent Interdict
  • Locus Standi
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Company Records Access
  • Ex Parte Applications
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2017] ZAGPPHC 73

Loest v Gendac (Pty) Ltd and Another (17699/2016)

Loest v Gendac (Pty) Ltd and Another (17699/2016) [2017] ZAGPPHC 73; 2017 (4) SA 187 (GP) (3 March 2017)

The court held that section 164 of the Companies Act provides a comprehensive mechanism for dissenting shareholders to obtain fair value for their shares, including the ability to approach the court for determination of fair value and for the court to appoint appraisers and order disclosure of necessary information. The applicant failed to establish that the requested information was reasonably required for the exercise of his appraisal rights under PAIA, as the statutory process under section 164 already provides for access to relevant information through the court. The mere existence of a r…

  • Promotion Of Access To Information Act
  • Appraisal Rights
  • Shareholder Protection
  • Fair Value Determination
  • Company Records Access
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2003] ZAWCHC 23

Davis v Clutcho (PTY) Ltd (1289/03)

Davis v Clutcho (PTY) Ltd (1289/03) [2003] ZAWCHC 23; [2003] 3 All SA 561 (C) (10 June 2003)

A shareholder obtained access under PAIA to company accounting records to value his shares and investigate possible financial mismanagement, subject to limits protecting customer identities.

  • Promotion Of Access To Information Act
  • Shareholder Rights
  • Company Records Access
  • Valuation Of Shares
  • Constitutional Right Of Access
  • Commercial Confidentiality
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.