Dotcom Trading 118 (Pty) Ltd v Hobbs Sinclair Advisory (Pty) Ltd (6532/2014)
Dotcom Trading 118 (Pty) Ltd v Hobbs Sinclair Advisory (Pty) Ltd (6532/2014) [2017] ZAWCHC 144 (12 December 2017)
The court found that the plaintiff had standing to sue on the contract, as the defendant conceded that the plaintiff company was the contracting party. The evidence established that the contract for consultancy services was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant in late July or early August 2012, with retrospective effect from 1 July 2012. The change in billing details and acceptance of invoices addressed to 'Hobbs Sinclair Business Rescue Services' reflected the parties' intention to substitute the defendant as debtor. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim to a 10% administrati…
Source excerpt
- Oral Contract
- Business Rescue
- Standing To Sue
- Contractual Liability
- Company Trading Name