Schutte v Five Lakes Farm CC and Others (18104/2014)
Schutte v Five Lakes Farm CC and Others (18104/2014) [2018] ZAWCHC 132 (15 February 2018)
The court found that the applicant established, on the evidence of Schutte, Kleynhans, and Oosthuizen, that water was extracted from the Duiwe River and led across Portion 211 to Portion 210 during the qualifying period, and that this use was authorised under the previous Water Act. The court held that it was not necessary for the applicant to prove the exact volume of water used, as the extent of an existing lawful water use is not limited to the specific volume extracted during the qualifying period. The court accepted the reliability of the applicant's witnesses over the respondent's, noti…
Source excerpt
- Praedial Servitude
- National Water Act
- Existing Lawful Water Use
- Onus Of Proof
- Compensation For Servitude