ENX Group Limited v Spilkin (2296/2022)
ENX Group Limited v Spilkin (2296/2022) [2022] ZAECQBHC 42 (8 November 2022)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a clear right to final interdictory relief. The communications and threats complained of were directed primarily at Mr. Hannington, who was not cited as an applicant, and not at the applicant company itself. The respondent's conduct, viewed in context, constituted attempts to recover monies he believed were due for services rendered, and his threats to institute legal proceedings or report alleged misconduct were lawful assertions of rights, not unlawful extortion or harassment. The applicant did not fully disclose the factual background,…
Source excerpt
- Final Interdict
- Defamation
- Harassment
- Extortion
- Compounding
- Urgent Application