Western Reefs Primary School v Erasmus Jooste Inc (CIV APP FB 19/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 39 (21 February 2025)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
CIV APP FB 19/2023
Judges
Petersen, Reid, Mfenyana
The court found that Erasmus Jooste Inc, as a firm of attorneys, failed to provide a reasonable and sufficient explanation for the delay in prosecuting the appeal. The misunderstanding regarding the need for a transcript was not justifiable for a professional litigant. The delay was substantial, and the explanation was weak, especially given the value of the claim and the expectation of diligence from attorneys. The documents required by the discovery order were not produced, and the claim was properly struck out. The interests of justice and the need for finality in litigation outweighed any…
Appel and Others v Democratic Alliance and Another (19623/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 26 (4 February 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
19623/2024
Judge
Lekhuleni
The High Court dismissed an urgent application by councillors to intervene and seek leave to appeal, finding the delay self-created and the appeal request out of time.
Elrico Koen t/a Elrico Motors v Wuister (16750/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 373 (18 November 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
16750/2024
Judge
A Bhoopchand
The High Court dismissed an application to reinstate a lapsed appeal, finding the delay unexplained, the record poorly prepared, and no prospects of success.
Lebra Development (Pty) Ltd and Others v Bester and Others (A154/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1087 (21 October 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A154/2022
Judges
E van der Schyff, C Collis, A Le Grange
The High Court refused to reinstate a lapsed appeal, finding the delay explanation unreasonable, the Directive argument unsustainable, and no prospect of success.
Thulo v S (CA57/2023) [2024] ZANWHC 231 (11 September 2024)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
CA57/2023
Judges
FMM Reid, NG Laubscher
The magistrate, having presided over the bail application and learned of the appellant's previous convictions, failed to recuse himself from the subsequent trial, resulting in a reasonable perception of bias. This irregularity was compounded by the magistrate's failure to provide reasons for the conviction and to allow the appellant an opportunity to present evidence after the section 174 application. These procedural defects violated the appellant's right to a fair trial. The delay in filing the appeal was due to difficulties in obtaining the transcribed record, which were not attributable t…
Director of Public Prosecutions Northern Cape v Tosa and Another (Appeal on Sentence) (CA& R 67/2022) [2023] ZANCHC 95; 2024 (1) SACR 217 (NCK) (8 December 2023)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
CA& R 67/2022
Judges
Mamosebo, Olivier
The court found that the Regional Magistrate had overemphasised the respondent's personal circumstances and failed to properly balance them against the seriousness of the offence and the interests of society. The sentence of a fine of R10,000 or two years' imprisonment, with a wholly suspended three-year term, was disproportionately lenient given the gravity of the corruption committed by a public officer. The court held that direct imprisonment should be the norm for such offences and that the monetary aspect of the punishment should be increased to reflect the seriousness of the crime. The…
Source excerpt
Corruption By Public Officer
Sentencing Discretion
Appeal On Sentence
Prevention And Combatting Of Corrupt Activities Act