D.S v G.S (2250/2023)
D.S v G.S (2250/2023) [2024] ZAMPMHC 54 (19 September 2024)
The court found that the applicant is entirely financially dependent on the respondent and has demonstrated a history of opulent living, which the respondent did not dispute during the marriage. The respondent failed to make full and frank disclosure of his financial affairs and did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim of inability to pay the amounts sought. The applicant substantiated her claims with financial records and expert reports, and the respondent's conduct in withholding disclosure and reducing maintenance was found to be abusive. The court exercised its discretion…
Source excerpt
- Maintenance Pendente Lite
- Contribution Towards Legal Costs
- Redistribution Claim
- Rule 43 Prolixity
- Condonation Of Affidavits