Zuma v Democratic Alliance and Others (836/2013)
Zuma v Democratic Alliance and Others (836/2013) [2014] ZASCA 101; [2014] 4 All SA 35 (SCA) (28 August 2014)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the High Court correctly interpreted and enforced its previous order regarding the production of the record of decision to discontinue prosecution against Mr Zuma. The audio recordings and transcripts referenced in the NDPP's announcement were not confidential, as they had been publicly quoted and verified by the National Intelligence Agency, and their existence predated Mr Zuma's representations. No specific claim of confidentiality was made by Mr Zuma regarding any particular document, and the NDPP's office failed to assert or justify any such claim. Th…
Source excerpt
- Review Of Prosecutorial Decision
- Confidentiality Of Representations
- Rule 53 Record Production
- Public Interest Standing
- Rationality Review
- Costs Orders