Daniels and Another v S (A347/19)
Daniels and Another v S (A347/19) [2021] ZAGPPHC 555 (20 August 2021)
The court found that count 13, being a conspiracy to commit fraud, constituted a duplication of convictions since the completed offences of fraud had already been proved. The appeal against conviction on count 13 was upheld and the sentence set aside. Regarding sentence, the court held that while the trial court considered the personal circumstances of the appellants, it failed to adequately account for the impact of asset forfeiture and the cumulative effect of the sentences. The court determined that substantial and compelling circumstances were present, justifying a reduction in the senten…
Source excerpt
- Fraud
- Conspiracy To Commit Fraud
- Minimum Sentencing
- Duplication Of Convictions
- Asset Forfeiture
- Mitigation Of Sentence