South Africa Case Law

Nkambule v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others (3589/2022)

Nkambule v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others (3589/2022) [2025] ZAMPMBHC 70 (1 August 2025)

Court

Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga

Case number

3589/2022

Judge

Shai

The court found that the plaintiff's continued detention after the successful appeal and order for release was unlawful, as the warrant of liberation was not transmitted timeously due to the Department of Justice's delay. Since both the Department of Justice and Correctional Services fall under the same Ministry, liability attaches to the Minister for Correctional Services. The plaintiff was deprived of his liberty for 77 days without just cause, violating his constitutional rights. In determining quantum, the court considered previous awards for unlawful detention, the duration of detention,…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Detention
• Quantum Of Damages
• Constitutional Right To Liberty

A.M.M v Minister of Police (1924/2023)

A.M.M v Minister of Police (1924/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 115 (9 July 2025)

Court

North West High Court, Mafikeng

Case number

1924/2023

Judge

Oosthuizen-Senekal

The plaintiff established that he was arrested and detained without a warrant, and the defendant, having failed to plead or appear, did not discharge the burden to justify the lawfulness of the arrest. The arrest and detention were therefore unlawful. The plaintiff's evidence of humiliation, emotional distress, and loss of livelihood, aggravated by his physical disability and the deplorable conditions of detention, warranted compensation. The quantum of damages was assessed with reference to comparable case law, the plaintiff's vulnerability, and the impact on his family and livelihood. Costs…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Arrest
• Unlawful Detention
• Damages Assessment
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Costs Award

Mashigoana v Minister of South African Police Service and Others (6027/2020)

Mashigoana v Minister of South African Police Service and Others (6027/2020) [2025] ZALMPPHC 128 (30 June 2025)

Court

Limpopo High Court, Polokwane

Case number

6027/2020

Judge

Stroh

The court found that the Plaintiff was lawfully arrested by the police officer, Thekupi, who acted on reasonable suspicion that the Plaintiff was in possession of a stolen vehicle, as required by section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the continued detention of the Plaintiff after he provided a reasonable explanation for possession—namely, that he had exchanged vehicles with AM Magane—was not justified. The evidence showed that the police obtained corroborating statements from AM Magane on the same day, confirming the vehicle exchange. The Defendant's witness, Mampuru, admit…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Arrest And Detention
• Section 40 Criminal Procedure Act
• Section 36 General Laws Amendment Act
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Onus Of Justification
• Standard Of Proof Civil

Minister of Police v Kulati (Appeal) (CA05/2022)

Minister of Police v Kulati (Appeal) (CA05/2022) [2025] ZAECMKHC 47 (23 May 2025)

Court

Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda

Case number

CA05/2022

Judges

RWN Brooks, NG Mjali, ZZ Matebese

The court held that section 59A of the Criminal Procedure Act does not impose a duty on police officials to initiate bail proceedings unless the detainee requests bail. The respondent was informed of his right to apply for bail, and there was no evidence that he wished to be released on bail prior to his first court appearance. The police fulfilled their statutory obligations by informing the respondent of his rights, and the absence of a request for bail meant that no further duty arose to facilitate bail. The approach adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Coetzee was endorsed, and the c…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Detention
• Police Duties
• Bail Application
• Section 59a Criminal Procedure Act
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Damages For Unlawful Detention

Tikoe v Minister of Police (1634/2023)

Tikoe v Minister of Police (1634/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 73 (15 April 2025)

Court

North West High Court, Mafikeng

Case number

1634/2023

Judge

T Masike

The High Court awarded R850,000 for unlawful arrest and detention, finding the plaintiff’s evidence uncontested and the detention conditions inhumane.

• Unlawful Arrest
• Unlawful Detention
• General Damages
• Quantum Of Damages
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Unlawful-arrest

Minister of Police v Stevens (A2024/100331)

Minister of Police v Stevens (A2024/100331) [2025] ZAGPJHC 361 (4 April 2025)

Court

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Case number

A2024/100331

Judges

Du Plessis, Meaden

The High Court dismissed an appeal over unlawful arrest and detention, holding that police failed to exercise the discretion required for a warrantless arrest.

• Unlawful Arrest
• Warrantless Arrest
• Section 40 Criminal Procedure Act
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Exercise Of Discretion
• Unlawful-arrest

M.G v Minister of Police (AR134/24)

M.G v Minister of Police (AR134/24) [2025] ZAKZPHC 34 (14 March 2025)

Court

Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg

Case number

AR134/24

Judges

Singh, Henriques

The High Court upheld an appeal on liability for unlawful arrest and detention after a domestic-violence complaint, and sent quantum back to the magistrates’ court.

• Unlawful Arrest
• Unlawful Detention
• Domestic Violence
• Onus Of Proof
• Damages Quantification
• Constitutional Right To Liberty

Odendaal v Minister of Police and Others (24378/2019)

Odendaal v Minister of Police and Others (24378/2019) [2025] ZAGPJHC 153 (20 February 2025)

Court

South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg

Case number

24378/2019

Judge

Mahalelo

The court found that the arresting officer, Captain Myburgh, failed to exercise his discretion rationally when arresting and detaining the plaintiff. The officer did not properly investigate the nature of the dispute, which was contractual and civil rather than criminal, and failed to engage with the plaintiff to ascertain the facts. The arrest was effected in a violent and humiliating manner, and the officer relied solely on the complainant's identification without further inquiry. The court held that the jurisdictional facts required by section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act were no…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Arrest And Detention
• Damages Assessment
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Police Liability
• Quantum Of Damages

Longman v Minister of Police (20/2023)

Longman v Minister of Police (20/2023) [2025] ZANWHC 6 (15 January 2025)

Court

North West High Court, Mafikeng

Case number

20/2023

Judge

A Reddy

The court found that the defendant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the arrest and detention of the plaintiff were lawful. The arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion based on the evidence available at the time, as the complainant's statement was vague and did not identify the plaintiff specifically. The officer failed to investigate exculpatory explanations and did not obtain further affidavits to clarify the allegations. The conditions of detention were inhumane, further aggravating the infringement of the plaintiff's rights. The court held that the deprivation of li…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Arrest
• Unlawful Detention
• Section 40 Criminal Procedure Act
• Damages Assessment
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Costs Award

Maritz v Minister of Police (661/2021)

Maritz v Minister of Police (661/2021) [2025] ZANWHC 8 (15 January 2025)

Court

North West High Court, Mafikeng

Case number

661/2021

Judge

R D Hendricks

The court found that the defendant failed to discharge the onus to prove the lawfulness of the plaintiff's arrest and detention. The plaintiff was not apprehended at the scene of the crime, was not found in possession of the stolen cow, and was not linked to the offence by any credible evidence. Key witnesses who could have clarified the circumstances of the arrest were not called, and the arresting officer relied solely on hearsay without conducting proper investigations. The plaintiff's version of events was uncontested and more probable. The conditions of detention were harsh and unchallen…

Source excerpt

• Unlawful Arrest
• Unlawful Detention
• Damages
• Constitutional Right To Liberty
• Onus Of Proof
• Quantum Of Damages