Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tax Law [2019] ZASCA 17

Benhaus Mining (Proprietary) Limited v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (165/2018)

Benhaus Mining (Proprietary) Limited v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (165/2018) [2019] ZASCA 17; 2020 (3) SA 325 (SCA); 2020 (3) SA 325 (SCA) (22 March 2019)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Benhaus Mining's activities—excavating and extracting mineral-bearing ore for delivery to clients—constituted mining operations within the meaning of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the Act's definition of mining is broad and encompasses every method or process by which minerals are won from the soil, and that Benhaus's work fell squarely within this definition. The court rejected the argument that commercial risk or involvement in the entire mining process is required, noting that Benhaus bore significant risk and performed the essential extract…

  • Income Tax Act
  • Capital Expenditure Deduction
  • Mining Operations Definition
  • Contract Mining
  • Accelerated Depreciation
  • Tax Assessment Dispute
Read case analysis
Tax Law [2017] ZATC 4

Benhaus Mining (Proprietary) Limited v Commissioner of the South African Revenue Services (13863)

Benhaus Mining (Proprietary) Limited v Commissioner of the South African Revenue Services (13863) [2017] ZATC 4; 80 SATC 455 (30 November 2017)

The court held that the appellant did not derive income from mining operations as defined in the Income Tax Act, as it did not hold mining rights and was not exposed to the commercial risks inherent in mining. The appellant's activities constituted contract mining for a fee, which does not qualify for mining capital allowances under section 15(a) and section 36. The court found that the appellant failed to ring-fence income and expenditure per mine or contract, as required by section 36(7E) and (7F), and that its equipment replacement policy could not override the objective useful life for de…

  • Mining Capital Allowances
  • Income Tax Act Section 15
  • Contract Mining
  • Recoupment Of Assets
  • Understatement Penalties
  • Section 89quat Interest
Read case analysis
Tax Law [2017] ZATC 16

ABC Trading (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service (13686)

ABC Trading (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service (13686) [2017] ZATC 16 (30 March 2017)

The court held that the appellant, as a contract miner, is not engaged in 'mining operations' as defined by the Income Tax Act. The appellant's activities are limited to extraction and ancillary services for mining right holders, without involvement in the commercial sale of minerals or bearing the associated risks. The income earned is for services rendered, not from mining operations, and the appellant does not meet the statutory requirements for capital expenditure deductions under sections 15 and 36. The appellant's business model does not allow for ring-fencing of capital expenditure to…

  • Mining Tax Deductions
  • Capital Expenditure
  • Contract Mining
  • Interest And Penalties
  • Tax Ring Fencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.