Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
G Phadziri & Sons (Pty) Ltd v Do Light Transport (Pty) Ltd and Another (765/2021) [2023] ZASCA 16 (20 February 2023)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a tripartite transport agreement was not void for vagueness and that no tacit term allowed termination on reasonable notice.
Zerga and Others v TT Empowerment CC (43785 / 2011) [2012] ZAGPJHC 127; [2012] 4 All SA 472 (GSJ) (14 June 2012)
The court held that a consent order cannot be unilaterally cancelled. It rejected a vagueness attack on clause 3 and dismissed the application with costs.
De Beer v Keyser and Others (195/2000) [2001] ZASCA 128; [2002] 1 All SA 368 (A); 2002 (1) SA 827 (SCA) (23 November 2001)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a franchise agreement was sufficiently certain, not contrary to public policy, and enforceable. The appeal was dismissed.
Namibian Minerals Corporation Ltd. v Benguella Concessions Ltd. (430/94) [1996] ZASCA 140; 1997 (2) SA 548 (SCA); [1997] 1 All SA 191 (A); (27 November 1996)
Appeal over a mining joint venture’s farm-in clause and contract certainty. The court held the clause too vague in key respects, but also discussed timing and interpretation.
Explore more
