Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2022] ZALCCT 9

Mgumane v Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (C180/2016)

Mgumane v Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (C180/2016) [2022] ZALCCT 9 (21 February 2022)

Court
Labour Court Cape Town
Case number
C180/2016
Judge
Rabkin-Naicker

The applicant's statement of claim was insufficiently detailed and did not comply with Rule 6 of the Labour Court Rules, failing to found a contractual claim under section 77(3) of the BCEA. The Labour Court, like the High Court, sits as a court of law when adjudicating contractual claims and requires pleadings that would pass muster in a civil court for breach of contract. Although equitable principles may assist unrepresented litigants, the parties did not flesh out the pleadings through a pre-trial minute as directed. Consequently, the applicant's claim was dismissed for want of jurisdicti…

Source excerpt

  • Jurisdiction Of Labour Court
  • Contractual Claims In Employment
  • Statement Of Claim Requirements
  • Unilateral Change To Terms
  • Rule 6 Compliance
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2009] ZALCD 3

Coestee and Another v Transnet Ltd and Others (D76/09)

Coestee and Another v Transnet Ltd and Others (D76/09) [2009] ZALCD 3 (16 March 2009)

Court
Labour Court Durban
Case number
D76/09
Judge
Pillay D

The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to interdict disciplinary proceedings based on a contractual claim when the underlying facts are regulated by the LRA. The applicants' cause of action, though framed as unlawful rather than unfair, arises from the same facts as those governed by the LRA and must be resolved through its dispute resolution mechanisms, namely conciliation and arbitration. Allowing direct applications to the Labour Court would undermine the specialised forums and procedures established by the LRA and open the floodgates to similar applications, contrary to legislative i…

Source excerpt

  • Jurisdiction Of Labour Court
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Contractual Claims In Employment
  • Interdicts Against Employer Action
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2009] ZALC 247

Coetsee and Another v Transnet Ltd and Others (D 76/09)

Coetsee and Another v Transnet Ltd and Others (D 76/09) [2009] ZALC 247 (16 March 2009)

Court
Labour Court
Case number
D76/09
Judge
Pillay D

The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to interdict disciplinary proceedings based on a contractual claim under section 77(3) of the BCEA when the underlying facts are regulated by the LRA. The dispute concerns conduct-related dismissal, which is comprehensively codified and must be resolved through the statutory mechanisms of conciliation and arbitration. Allowing the application would undermine the legislative intent of the LRA, encourage forum shopping, and open the floodgates to similar claims. The applicants' objections and grounds for relief should be raised in the disciplinary pro…

Source excerpt

  • Jurisdiction Of Labour Court
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Contractual Claims In Employment
  • Interdicts Against Employer Action
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.