Selesho v FNB (40719/16)
Selesho v FNB (40719/16) [2020] ZAGPPHC 511 (7 September 2020)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide a satisfactory and candid explanation for the circumstances in which the admission was made and for the delay in seeking its withdrawal. The applicant's conduct, including his lack of transparency regarding his dealings with Holmes and the business venture, undermined his bona fides. The court held that the admission made by the applicant's attorney was consistent with the evidence and the applicant's own statements in other forums. Furthermore, the withdrawal of the admission would cause prejudice to the respondent, particularly due to the…
Source excerpt
- Withdrawal Of Admission
- Rule 37 Uniform Rules
- Contractual Delivery
- Prejudice In Amendment
- Bona Fide Requirement