Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2024] ZAGPPHC 905

African Exploration Mining and Finance Corporation (SOC) Limited v LME Plant Hire (Pty) Ltd (060853/2023)

African Exploration Mining and Finance Corporation (SOC) Limited v LME Plant Hire (Pty) Ltd (060853/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 905 (9 September 2024)

The Court found that the applicant's delay in bringing the self-review application was unreasonable and inadequately explained, as the applicant failed to provide any substantive justification for not acting sooner. Nevertheless, the Court exercised its discretion to overlook the delay, given the public interest in preventing harm to the public purse and the fact that the rental agreement was concluded for an amount higher than the Board-approved contract price. The Court determined that the rental agreement was invalid due to lack of proper Board approval and breach of procurement conditions…

  • Self Review
  • Delay In Legality Review
  • Public Procurement
  • Just And Equitable Relief
  • Contractual Invalidity
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2023] ZAGPJHC 1438

Hlaniki Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (23998/2017)

Hlaniki Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (23998/2017) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1438 (13 June 2023)

The court found that the Service Level Agreement between the applicant and respondent was invalid as it extended beyond three budgetary years without compliance with section 33 of the MFMA. The issue of legality was not raised mero motu but during closing arguments, and both parties were given an opportunity to address it. The applicant failed to amend its particulars of claim or seek deviation from National Treasury. The court determined that public funds were at stake and could not ignore statutory non-compliance. All grounds for leave to appeal were previously considered and did not raise…

  • Municipal Finance Management Act
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Public Procurement
  • Contractual Invalidity
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] ZAGPJHC 257

Special Investigating Unit v Chauke Quantity Surveyors & Project Management in association with listed entities and Others (45529/16)

Special Investigating Unit v Chauke Quantity Surveyors & Project Management in association with listed entities and Others (45529/16) [2020] ZAGPJHC 257 (27 October 2020)

The court found that the contract between the Department of Public Works and the consortium contemplated that the scope of work and project cost would be determined after the award of the tender, and that percentage-based fees would be paid accordingly. The increase in scope and cost was authorised by the Department through instructions and approvals at various stages, and the consortium acted on these instructions. The applicant failed to establish that the increase was unauthorised or that any breach occurred that would render the contract void ab initio. The court held that contract law do…

  • Public Procurement
  • Contractual Invalidity
  • Scope Of Work Variation
  • Declaratory Relief
  • Enrichment Claims
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2018] ZAGPPHC 900

Trudon (Pty) Ltd (formerly TDS Directory Operations ) v National Prosecuting Authority and Another (43247/2014)

Trudon (Pty) Ltd (formerly TDS Directory Operations ) v National Prosecuting Authority and Another (43247/2014) [2018] ZAGPPHC 900 (23 November 2018)

The court held that the defendants, as organs of state, are not entitled to ignore their own decision to conclude the agreements or to raise invalidity as a defence without instituting proper review proceedings or at least an application for a declarator. The principle established in Oudekraal and affirmed in Kirland and Merafong is that administrative acts, even if unlawful, remain effective until set aside by a court. The collateral challenge doctrine is available only in limited and appropriate circumstances, typically where a party is coerced into compliance with an unlawful administrativ…

  • Legality Of Administrative Action
  • Collateral Challenge
  • Public Procurement
  • Contractual Invalidity
  • Constitutional Principle Of Legality
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2015] ZASCA 54

Hansa Silver (Pty) Ltd and Others v Obifon (Pty) Ltd t/a The High Street Auction Company (192/2014)

Hansa Silver (Pty) Ltd and Others v Obifon (Pty) Ltd t/a The High Street Auction Company (192/2014) [2015] ZASCA 54; 2015 (4) SA 17 (SCA) (30 March 2015)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the auctioneer's bids on behalf of the sellers did not constitute misrepresentation or fraud. The rules of the auction, which permitted vendor bidding up to the reserve price, were made available and read out to all bidders, including the appellants. The Consumer Protection Act requires only prior notice of vendor bidding, not contemporaneous identification of such bids. The regulations cited by the appellants do not apply to auctioneers bidding on behalf of sellers. The appellants, being experienced in auctions, were not misled or induced by any alleged…

  • Auction Sales
  • Vendor Bidding
  • Misrepresentation
  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Contractual Invalidity
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.