Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAWCHC 258

Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner's Association (Leave to Appeal) (2025/040657)

Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner's Association (Leave to Appeal) (2025/040657) [2025] ZAWCHC 258 (20 June 2025)

The Court found that while the Applicants had previously enjoyed use of the Respondent’s facilities, this use was governed by a contract that had expired. The Applicants’ claim for relief under the mandament van spolie was not appropriate because their rights were contractual and personal, not possessory. The Court followed the principle established in Abrahams, holding that the law protects possession, not mere access or contractual rights. However, the Court was persuaded that another Court might reach a different conclusion given the complex interplay between contracts and quasi-possession…

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Quasi Possession
  • Contractual Rights Vs Possession
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Specific Performance
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPJHC 521

Simons v City of Johannesburg Forensic DPT and Others (38151/2019)

Simons v City of Johannesburg Forensic DPT and Others (38151/2019) [2019] ZAGPJHC 521 (26 November 2019)

The court found that the applicant's right to electricity supply arose from a contractual relationship with the electricity vendor via the prepaid meter system, not from possession of the property. The mandament van spolie remedy is not available for the enforcement of purely contractual rights. The applicant's claim for restoration of electricity supply was therefore not appropriate for spoliation relief. The court relied on established precedent, including Eskom Holdings Limited v Masinda and Zungu v Nilgra Flats, which held that spoliation does not apply to personal rights arising from con…

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Electricity Supply Disputes
  • Contractual Rights Vs Possession
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.