Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2015] ZAFSHC 215

Ex parte: Kabi; In re: Groenpunt Correctional Supervision and Parole Board v S and Others (476/2015)

Ex parte: Kabi; In re: Groenpunt Correctional Supervision and Parole Board v S and Others (476/2015) [2015] ZAFSHC 215 (30 October 2015)

High Court held an ex parte correctional supervision order was a nullity for failure to follow Section 276A(3) procedures. Amendment was dismissed.

  • Correctional Supervision
  • Conversion Of Sentence
  • Locus Standi
  • Ex Parte Applications
  • Authority Of Deponent
  • Correctional-supervision
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2013] ZAGPPHC 152

Minister of Correctional Services and Another v Johnson and Others (16515/2012)

Minister of Correctional Services and Another v Johnson and Others (16515/2012) [2013] ZAGPPHC 152; 2013 (2) SACR 565 (GNP) (12 June 2013)

A Full Bench held that a magistrate lacked jurisdiction to convert prison sentences to correctional supervision because release was more than five years away.

  • Jurisdiction Of Magistrate
  • Conversion Of Sentence
  • Correctional Supervision
  • Principle Of Legality
  • Interpretation Of Statute
  • Criminal-procedure-act
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2012] ZAGPPHC 324

C.V v Minister of Correctional Services and Others (48967/2012)

C.V v Minister of Correctional Services and Others (48967/2012) [2012] ZAGPPHC 324 (30 November 2012)

The court found that the parole board's decision was arbitrary and capricious, as it was made without considering all prescribed information, including updated reports from the social worker and psychologist and victim representations. The absence of this information rendered the decision unlawful under PAJA. The court held that only the parole board is empowered to form the opinion required for referral to the sentencing court for reconsideration of sentence, and there were no exceptional circumstances justifying the court substituting its own decision. The matter was remitted to the parole…

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Parole Review
  • Conversion Of Sentence
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Correctional Supervision
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.