S v Thage (SR12/18) [2018] ZAGPPHC 911 (5 April 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
SR12/18
Judge
Tuchten
The court found that, due to the malfunctioning of the recording equipment and the death of the presiding magistrate, the record of the proceedings could not be reconstructed. Only the recollections of the parties and the charge sheet were available, which were insufficient for a proper review. In the interests of justice, the conviction was set aside. The court clarified that this order does not amount to an acquittal and the prosecution may proceed afresh, requiring the accused to plead again to the charge.
S v Vusi (06/2015) [2015] ZAFSHC 90 (29 April 2015)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
06/2015
Judges
A. Williams, C. Van Zyl
Automatic review of a criminal conviction was set aside because the guilty plea proceedings did not cover all essential elements required by section 112(1)(b).
S v Thwala (A92/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 114 (26 February 2015)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A92/2015
Judges
M Ismail, N V Khumalu
The High Court set aside a child accused’s conviction because no preliminary inquiry was held under section 43 of the Child Justice Act before conviction.
S v Solomon (ECJ 2004/027) [2004] ZAECHC 31 (9 September 2004)
Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Case number
ECJ 2004/027
Judges
C Plasket, LE Leach
On special review, the High Court set aside convictions under the Arms and Ammunition Act and remitted the matter so it could proceed under the Firearm Control Act.