Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAFSHC 373

Mahamo v Venter and Others (A98/2024)

Mahamo v Venter and Others (A98/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC 373 (19 November 2024)

The appeal against a magistrate’s costs order was dismissed. The High Court found no basis to interfere with the attorney-and-client costs awarded on rescission.

  • Costs On Appeal
  • Attorney And Client Costs
  • Condonation
  • Misjoinder
  • Default Judgment
  • Costs-on-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 799

YG Properties Investments (Pty) Ltd v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Another (Leave to Appeal Application) (2023/059368)

YG Properties Investments (Pty) Ltd v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Another (Leave to Appeal Application) (2023/059368) [2024] ZAGPJHC 799 (13 August 2024)

The High Court struck a leave to appeal application from the roll, holding that the interim and urgency orders were not appealable and had lapsed.

  • Appealability Of Interim Orders
  • Urgency
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Rule Nisi
  • Condonation
  • Appealability-of-interim-orders
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 869

Minister of South African Police Services and Others v Mudolo (A274/12022)

Minister of South African Police Services and Others v Mudolo (A274/12022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 869 (17 July 2024)

The court held that the appeal had become moot due to the setting aside of the underlying Magistrates Court order and the dismissal of subsequent appeals. The only remaining issue was the cost order. The appellants failed to establish exceptional circumstances as required by section 16(2)(a)(ii) of the Superior Courts Act to justify setting aside the cost order. The court emphasized that fairness or perceived unconscionable results are not the test; only truly exceptional circumstances warrant deviation from the general rule that costs alone do not justify hearing a moot appeal. Both parties…

  • Mootness
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Superior Courts Act Section 16
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 610

Van Dyk and Another v Rhodes (23121/2019)

Van Dyk and Another v Rhodes (23121/2019) [2024] ZAGPJHC 610 (28 June 2024)

The High Court granted leave to appeal after finding reasonable prospects of success, but directed the appeal to a Full Court rather than the SCA.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Prospects Of Success
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Reasonable-prospects-of-success
  • Full-court-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZASCA 32

Cyril and Another v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (186/2023)

Cyril and Another v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (186/2023) [2024] ZASCA 32 (28 March 2024)

The Supreme Court of Appeal struck an appeal from the roll, holding that an order allowing SARS to intervene in a review over admissibility was not appealable.

  • Appealability Of Interlocutory Orders
  • Customs And Excise Act
  • Review Of Evidentiary Rulings
  • Standing To Intervene
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Appealability-of-interlocutory-orders
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 285

Blair Atholl Homeowners Association (NPC) v Meyer and Another (46150/2018)

Blair Atholl Homeowners Association (NPC) v Meyer and Another (46150/2018) [2024] ZAGPPHC 285 (14 March 2024)

The High Court granted leave to appeal, finding that the applicant had shown reasonable prospects of success under section 17 of the Superior Courts Act.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Reasonable Prospect Of Success
  • Superior Courts Act
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Reasonable-prospects-of-success
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAWCHC 46

Body Corporate of Merriman Court and Others v Greeff - Reasons for Rule 42(1) (A212/2022)

Body Corporate of Merriman Court and Others v Greeff - Reasons for Rule 42(1) (A212/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 46 (19 February 2024)

The Full Bench found that the original judgment delivered on 13 February 2024 omitted a clear order regarding the costs of the appeal. Given the appellants' success, the principle that costs follow the result applies. The omission was rectified under Rule 42(1)(b) of the Uniform Rules, and the order was varied to specify that the respondent shall bear the costs of the appeal. The orders of the court a quo were set aside, and the respondent's application was dismissed with costs.

  • Variation Of Order
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Rule 42 Uniform Rules
  • Setting Aside Orders
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2021] ZAECGHC 100

Provincial Heritage Authority, Eastern Cape v Mellon Developments (CA 254/2019; 515/2018)

Provincial Heritage Authority, Eastern Cape v Mellon Developments (CA 254/2019; 515/2018) [2021] ZAECGHC 100 (18 November 2021)

The appeal was rendered moot because the respondent sold and transferred the property before the appeal was heard, making any order regarding the demolition permit ineffective. The Heritage Act confers a personal right to the permit applicant, which cannot be transferred to a new owner. The respondent, as a reasonable litigant, should have informed the appellant of the sale once the suspensive conditions were fulfilled, thereby avoiding unnecessary costs. The court found that the costs of the appeal were wasted and should be borne by the respondent, while the costs order of the court a quo sh…

  • National Heritage Resources Act
  • Judicial Review
  • Mootness
  • Permit Application
  • Costs On Appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAECGHC 55

B.N.K (born P) v M.R.K (CA 297/2019)

B.N.K (born P) v M.R.K (CA 297/2019) [2020] ZAECGHC 55 (2 June 2020)

High Court appeal about costs after rescission of a default divorce-related order. The court held the magistrate misdirected herself and awarded costs against the respondent.

  • Costs On Appeal
  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Default Judgment
  • Party And Party Costs
  • Divorce Proceedings
  • Costs-on-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAWCHC 10

Durr v Noe and Others (A150/18; 6802/2013)

Durr v Noe and Others (A150/18; 6802/2013) [2019] ZAWCHC 10 (15 February 2019)

High Court appeal against a costs order after an exception to a conditional counterclaim in a partnership dispute. The appeal was upheld and the costs order set aside.

  • Exception To Pleadings
  • Costs On Appeal
  • Partnership Dispute
  • Counterclaim
  • Superior Courts Act
  • Exception-to-pleadings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.