Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2019] ZAFSHC 87

Mokhothu v S (A206/2018)

Mokhothu v S (A206/2018) [2019] ZAFSHC 87 (6 June 2019)

The High Court upheld an appeal against a rape conviction, finding the complainant’s evidence inconsistent and unreliable and setting aside sentence.

  • Rape
  • Identification Evidence
  • Single Witness
  • Credibility
  • Reasonable Doubt
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAECGHC 107

Nqweniso v S (CA&R23/2013)

Nqweniso v S (CA&R23/2013) [2016] ZAECGHC 107 (17 October 2016)

Appeal against convictions for housebreaking, rape and sexual assault dismissed; the High Court confirmed the trial court’s findings and sentences.

  • Sexual Offences
  • Housebreaking
  • Rape
  • Assessment Of Single Witness
  • Credibility
  • Minimum Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAGPPHC 772

Mtsweni v S (A377/14)

Mtsweni v S (A377/14) [2016] ZAGPPHC 772 (26 August 2016)

Appeal against rape conviction and 10-year sentence dismissed. The High Court found the complainant credible, the appellant’s version inconsistent, and consent not proved.

  • Rape
  • Consent
  • Credibility Of Single Witness
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Presumption Of Innocence
  • Single-witness-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAGPJHC 155

S v Lekhwareni and Others (SS 073/2015)

S v Lekhwareni and Others (SS 073/2015) [2016] ZAGPJHC 155 (16 May 2016)

The court held that the written statement made by accused number four to the investigating officer was inadmissible as evidence. The statement was exculpatory and not a confession or admission under section 219A of the Criminal Procedure Act. The court found that, regardless of the purpose for which the statement was tendered, any extracurial statement made to a person in authority must be shown to have been made freely and voluntarily. The evidence presented did not satisfy the court, beyond reasonable doubt, that the statement was made freely and voluntarily. The circumstances surrounding t…

  • Admissibility Of Extracurial Statements
  • Hearsay Evidence
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Voluntariness
  • Credibility
  • Constitutional Rights
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2014] ZASCA 159

Tofie v S (104/14)

Tofie v S (104/14) [2014] ZASCA 159 (1 October 2014)

The Supreme Court of Appeal overturned rape convictions after finding the complainant's evidence unreliable, contradictory, and unsupported by corroboration.

  • Rape
  • Single Witness Cautionary Rule
  • Credibility Of Complainant
  • Corroboration
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Appeal Against Conviction
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2013] ZAGPJHC 181

Makgai v S (A571/2011)

Makgai v S (A571/2011) [2013] ZAGPJHC 181 (22 July 2013)

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal and upheld convictions for rape, kidnapping, and assault, finding the complainant’s single-witness evidence reliable.

  • Rape
  • Kidnapping
  • Assault With Intent To Do Grievous Bodily Harm
  • Single Witness Evidence
  • Credibility
  • Domestic Violence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2007] ZASCA 14

S v Cornick and Another (409/06)

S v Cornick and Another (409/06) [2007] ZASCA 14; [2007] 2 All SA 447 (SCA); 2007 (2) SACR 115 (SCA) (20 March 2007)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed appeals against rape convictions and sentences, finding the complainant credible despite a 19-year delay in reporting.

  • Rape
  • Credibility Of Single Witness
  • Cautionary Rule
  • Sentencing
  • Corroboration
  • Delayed Reporting
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1997] ZAECHC 9

S v Kameli (CA&R 24/96)

S v Kameli (CA&R 24/96) [1997] ZAECHC 9 (7 February 1997)

The High Court upheld a conviction for assault with intent to commit grievous bodily harm and confirmed a two-year sentence after rejecting the appeal.

  • Assault With Intent To Commit Grievous Bodily Harm
  • Failure To Cross Examine
  • Credibility Of Accused
  • Sentencing Principles
  • First Offender
  • Judicial Duties
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1992] ZASCA 203

S v Mabaso (371/91)

S v Mabaso (371/91) [1992] ZASCA 203 (24 November 1992)

The court upheld a theft conviction for possession of a stolen vehicle, finding the appellant's explanation implausible and rejecting interference with sentence.

  • Theft Of Motor Vehicle
  • Possession Of Stolen Property
  • Credibility Of Explanation
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Criminal-law
  • Theft
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.