Firstrand Bank Limited v Rampersad and Another (14063/2018P)
Firstrand Bank Limited v Rampersad and Another (14063/2018P) [2024] ZAKZPHC 81 (18 September 2024)
The court found that Applicant failed to make out a case for reinstatement of the cancelled credit agreement, as no consensus or fresh meeting of the minds was established between the parties. The requirements of Rule 42 were not met, as there was no error, ambiguity, or common mistake in the original order, nor were there new facts justifying variation. The monthly payment of R11 500.00 was found to be insufficient given the increased arrears and interest, but the draft order proposed by Applicant was inappropriate and unsupported by the papers. The court determined that a just and equitable…
Source excerpt
- Variation Of Court Order
- Default Judgment
- Credit Agreement Cancellation
- Rule 42
- Sale In Execution