Sanyanga v City of Johannesburg and Another (4506/22)
Sanyanga v City of Johannesburg and Another (4506/22) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1374 (14 November 2024)
The court found that the applicants, as tenants, have locus standi to challenge the municipality's actions affecting their public law rights to municipal services, relying on Joseph v City of Johannesburg. The City failed to comply with procedural fairness requirements by not serving the pre-termination notice at a prominent place accessible to tenants, thus depriving them of an opportunity to engage or challenge the disconnection. The existence of unresolved billing disputes further justified the applicants' urgent approach and the granting of the interdict. The requirements for a final inte…
Source excerpt
- Municipal Services Disconnection
- Procedural Fairness
- Locus Standi
- Contempt Of Court
- Credit Control By Laws
- Interdict Requirements