Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPJHC 314

Blue Bulls Company (Pty)Ltd vs Mega Burst Oils and Fuels (Pty)Ltd (2021/18739)

Blue Bulls Company (Pty)Ltd vs Mega Burst Oils and Fuels (Pty)Ltd (2021/18739) [2022] ZAGPJHC 314 (21 April 2022)

Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2021/18739
Judge
Molahlehi

The court held that the applicant failed to persuade it to exercise its discretion in favour of rescinding the winding-up order. Although the applicant settled the debt with the first respondent and obtained its consent, the interests of other creditors, notably FNB, who is owed over R2 million, were not addressed or safeguarded. The applicant also failed to make provision for the remuneration and expenses of the liquidators, whose interests must be protected before a winding-up order is set aside. The court confirmed that rescission applications must be brought under section 354 of the Compa…

Source excerpt

  • Winding Up Order Rescission
  • Companies Act Section 354
  • Liquidator Powers
  • Creditor Interest
  • Urgent Application Procedure
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2013] ZASCA 185

Motala and Others v Master of the High Court and Others (313/13)

Motala and Others v Master of the High Court and Others (313/13) [2013] ZASCA 185; [2014] 2 All SA 154 (SCA) (29 November 2013)

Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
313/13
Judges
Brand, Tshiqi, Wallis, Willis, Van der Merwe

The court held that even if section 420 of the Companies Act could be interpreted to revive proceedings commenced prior to dissolution, the application must fail because the appellants did not demonstrate that the avoidance of dissolution would serve the interests of creditors. There was no evidence that creditors supported the application or were aware of the litigation. The claim was speculative, and the liquidators failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the dissolution while litigation was ongoing. The prejudice to the respondents from resuming litigation after many years was sig…

Source excerpt

  • Company Dissolution
  • Liquidation Proceedings
  • Court Discretion
  • Revival Of Proceedings
  • Creditor Interest
  • Administrative Error
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.