Bowker v Ferreira NO and Another (2109/11)
Bowker v Ferreira NO and Another (2109/11) [2011] ZAECGHC 47 (22 September 2011)
The court found that the funds sought by the applicant for legal expenses were almost entirely derived from assets misappropriated from the victim and his close corporation. The applicant admitted substantial indebtedness, and the restrained assets may not be sufficient to cover the outstanding debt. Releasing the funds would result in dissipation of assets to the prejudice of the victim. The applicant had not applied for legal aid, which she would likely qualify for, and instead sought to employ counsel of her own choice using disputed funds. The court held that the applicant is not entitled…
Source excerpt
- Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
- Restraint Order
- Legal Expenses
- Creditor Interests