Motsepe v S (A 816/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 1016; 2015 (2) SACR 125 (GP); 2015 (5) SA 126 (GP) (5 November 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A 816/2013
Judges
Molefe, Janse van Nieuwenhuizen
Appeal against a criminal defamation conviction by a journalist succeeded because the State failed to prove intentional publication beyond reasonable doubt.
S v Hoho (493/05) [2008] ZASCA 98; [2009] 1 All SA 103 (SCA) ; 2009 (1) SACR 276 (SCA) (17 September 2008)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
493/05
Judges
Streicher, Heher, Mlambo, Cachalia, Kgomo
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that criminal defamation has not been abrogated by disuse in South African law. The absence of reported convictions does not amount to tacit repeal, as prosecutions may occur in lower courts and the legislature has continued to recognise the crime. The court found that criminal defamation is not inconsistent with the Constitution. While freedom of expression is a foundational right, it is not absolute and must be balanced against the right to human dignity and reputation. The requirements for criminal defamation are more onerous than those for civil defamation…