Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2023] ZANCHC 63

S v Pokola (Special Review) (CA&R 38/2023)

S v Pokola (Special Review) (CA&R 38/2023) [2023] ZANCHC 63; 2023 (2) SACR 643 (NCK) (24 August 2023)

High Court review of a magistrate’s departure from a plea and sentence agreement under section 105A of the CPA, resulting in the conviction and sentence being set aside.

  • Plea And Sentence Agreement
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 105a
  • Fraud
  • Immigration Act Offence
  • Review Of Magistrate Decision
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] ZAFSHC 67

S v Wessels (62/2019)

S v Wessels (62/2019) [2019] ZAFSHC 67 (23 May 2019)

On automatic review, the High Court held that a plea and sentence agreement was invalid because the accused was unrepresented when it was concluded.

  • Plea And Sentence Agreement
  • Legal Representation
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 105a
  • Irregularity In Proceedings
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Waiver Of Rights
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] ZASCA 151

Jansen v The State (40043/14; 229/14)

Jansen v The State (40043/14; 229/14) [2015] ZASCA 151; 2016 (1) SACR 377 (SCA) (2 October 2015)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a court may not depart from a plea and sentence agreement without first telling the parties it considers the proposed sentence unjust.

  • Plea And Sentence Agreements
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 105a
  • Irregularity In Sentencing
  • Remittal For Retrial
  • Plea-and-sentence-agreements
  • Criminal-procedure-act-section-105a
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2008] ZAGPHC 43

S v Nel (A352/07)

S v Nel (A352/07) [2008] ZAGPHC 43 (28 January 2008)

The court found that the Magistrate had strictly complied with the requirements of section 105A of the Criminal Procedure Act. The appellant was legally represented throughout, confirmed his plea and the agreement freely and voluntarily, and no evidence of undue influence or irregularity was presented. The appellant's current version was not raised before the Magistrate and was considered an afterthought. The record showed that the appellant's constitutional rights were protected and that the proceedings were procedurally faultless. No grounds for review or interference under section 24 of th…

  • Plea And Sentence Agreement
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 105a
  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Review Of Inferior Courts
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2006] ZAFSHC 112

S v Mashiyana (218/2006)

S v Mashiyana (218/2006) [2006] ZAFSHC 112 (9 March 2006)

The High Court amended a magistrate’s sentence on special review to correct a bona fide drafting error in a plea and sentence agreement.

  • Plea And Sentence Agreement
  • Suspended Sentence
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 304
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 105a
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Special-review
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.